Hi,
        I am also interested about the IPv6 enabled jail....
        Best Regards,

Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Jan Knepper wrote:

Andre Oppermann wrote:
Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello,

It may be interesting to mention that yesterday there was a presentation
at the NLUUG (Netherlands UNIX Users Group) conference by Marco Zec, who
once wrote a patchset for FreeBSD 4.11 (and is in the process of porting
it to FreeBSD 7.x) that gives each jail its own networking stack.

You can hook up physical interfaces to jails or perform bridging between
jails through netgraph bridging code. That way you can create virtual
network topologies on a single box. This will allow you to use multiple
IPv4 and IPv6 addresses on each instance. You can even use (I)PF(W)
inside jails.

I'm working on a "light" variant of multi-IPv[46] per jail.  It doesn't
create an entirely new network instance per jail and probably is more
suitable for low- to mid-end (virtual) hosting.  In those cases you
normally want the host administrator to excercise full control over
IP address and firewall configuration of the individual jails.  For
high-end stuff where you offer jail based virtual machines or network
and routing simulations Marco's work is more appropriate.
Any of this available in 7.x at the moment?
I have a patched 6.2-STABLE running with 7 jails with multiple IP addresses. Would not be able to upgrade that box unless this becomes available or unless I port it to 7.x...

Thanks!
Jan


_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to