Hi Guys,
I'm having some issues with rewriting a simple malloc() function to be
with FreeBSD (AMD64). This is part of porting an application from
Linux
to FreeBSD.
After pulling my hair out for a while, I've found that the sbrk()
system call just returns "45 - Operation Not Su
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 01:22, darran kartaschew wrote:
>
>Hi Guys,
>I'm having some issues with rewriting a simple malloc() function to be
>with FreeBSD (AMD64). This is part of porting an application from
>Linux
>to FreeBSD.
>After pulling my hair out for a while, I'
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
The why is because I like centralized management and it would be
really handy for that. For my use, it would be handy in regards to my
laptops.
I feel better central management is extreme significant. If I had
nothing more to say than "this would be nea
Lamont Granquist wrote:
> Why are you doing this in the FreeBSD rc scripts directly? Why not
> install cfengine and work on making cfengine play better with
> database-driven config?
Indeed. For a "many systems" problem, cfengine is a great tool. I
think the OP is more interested in the "dynamic
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Lamont Granquist wrote:
> > And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config file, what
> > would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory.
> Good news for you, we already support that. :) I agree that it make
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
Lamont Granquist wrote:
Why are you doing this in the FreeBSD rc scripts directly? Why not
install cfengine and work on making cfengine play better with
database-driven config?
Indeed. For a "many systems" problem, cfengine is a great tool. I
think t
Vulpes Velox wrote:
> There will be no massive patch for it, given it involves little more
> than the inclusion of a single rc.d file and a bit of documentation.
In that case, you'll be glad to know that the base in 6.x and newer
already supports running a local rc.d script in the overall rcorder
Lamont Granquist wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config file, what
>>> would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory.
>>
>> Good news for you, we already support that. :) I agree that it makes a
>> great
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:14:17 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vulpes Velox wrote:
>
> > There will be no massive patch for it, given it involves little
> > more than the inclusion of a single rc.d file and a bit of
> > documentation.
>
> In that case, you'll be glad to know that th
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 16:52, Brad L. Chisholm wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:53:47 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 January 2007 10:27, Brian Dean wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe that I can generate a kernel dump. We tried this yesterday
> > > but didn't have a dump device configu
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
Lamont Granquist wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config file, what
would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory.
Good news for you, we already support that. :) I agree
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:26:57 -0800 (PST)
Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
> > The why is because I like centralized management and it would be
> > really handy for that. For my use, it would be handy in regards
> > to my laptops.
> >
>
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:56:23 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lamont Granquist wrote:
>
> > Why are you doing this in the FreeBSD rc scripts directly? Why
> > not install cfengine and work on making cfengine play better with
> > database-driven config?
>
> Indeed. For a "many syst
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 04:54:59PM -0600, Vulpes Velox wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:14:17 -0800
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Vulpes Velox wrote:
> >
> > > There will be no massive patch for it, given it involves little
> > > more than the inclusion of a single rc.d file and a
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:53:47 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 04 January 2007 10:27, Brian Dean wrote:
> >
> > I believe that I can generate a kernel dump. We tried this yesterday
> > but didn't have a dump device configured.
>
> If this is 6.x, turn on minidumps via the sysctl. The dump
> Is there a particular reason you have to use assembly and not C?
The whole application is in assembly (some of us still enjoy coding in
assembly), and rather not link to libc if I don't have to. (There are
about 5 syscalls for the entire application, porting between each OS's
hasn
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:53:24PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 January 2007 16:52, Brad L. Chisholm wrote:
> >
> > I work with Brian, and have been helping him analyze this problem. We have
> > been able to generate kernel dumps, and have also done some additional
> > analysis un
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config file,
what would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory.
That gets away from the need to tweak and edit the /etc/rc.conf
config file with multiple inputs tweaking a single file.
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:44:39PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> On 2007.01.07. 1:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >It sounds as if the caller of ufs_rename() is confused. You could
> >try setting a breakpoint on the printf(), or change it to a panic()
> >to get a dump, and try to figure out who the c
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:56:23 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lamont Granquist wrote:
Why are you doing this in the FreeBSD rc scripts directly? Why
not install cfengine and work on making cfengine play better with
database-driven config?
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:10:36 -0800 (PST)
Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:56:23 -0800
> > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Lamont Granquist wrote:
> >>> Why are you doing this in the FreeBSD rc script
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 19:15, Brad L. Chisholm wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:53:24PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 16:52, Brad L. Chisholm wrote:
> > >
> > > I work with Brian, and have been helping him analyze this problem. We
> > > have
> > > been able
I have a few questions for pjd (or anyone else) about using gjournal,
particularly when used with gmirror.
1) I'm running 6-STABLE and plan to test with gjournal6_20061030.patch (from
the mailing list; updated version of 20061024 that applies cleanly). Is
there a better/newer version for -STABL
On Wed, January 10, 2007 2:43 pm, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Lamont Granquist wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
> And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config
> file, what would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.co
24 matches
Mail list logo
