Hi all.
Could I change the kernel version tag manually? say, I have a kernel which is
7.0-CUREENT, but for some reasons I wanna it be something like 6.1-RELEASE,
while the kernel itself does't change from 7.0-CURRENT to 6.1-RELEASE. All I
want is the change of tag. For example, if this works, t
Yuan, Jue wrote:
Hi all.
Could I change the kernel version tag manually? say, I have a kernel which is
7.0-CUREENT, but for some reasons I wanna it be something like 6.1-RELEASE,
while the kernel itself does't change from 7.0-CURRENT to 6.1-RELEASE. All I
want is the change of tag. For examp
Yuan, Jue wrote:
Hi all.
Could I change the kernel version tag manually? say, I have a kernel which is
7.0-CUREENT, but for some reasons I wanna it be something like 6.1-RELEASE,
while the kernel itself does't change from 7.0-CURRENT to 6.1-RELEASE. All I
want is the change of tag. For exampl
On Thursday 24 August 2006 16:45, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Eric Anderson wrote:
>
> > On 08/20/06 04:21, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Eric Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm tired of trying to use rsync or gcp (which doesn't like symlinks
> >>> often) to copy trees of files/di
Hi,
I've done it. Thanks for the road map.
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : I have the fol
On Friday 25 August 2006 22:02, Intron is my alias on the Internet wrote:
> Yuan, Jue wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Could I change the kernel version tag manually? say, I have a kernel
> > which is 7.0-CUREENT, but for some reasons I wanna it be something like
> > 6.1-RELEASE, while the kernel itself
On Friday 25 August 2006 22:32, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Yuan, Jue wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Could I change the kernel version tag manually? say, I have a kernel
> > which is 7.0-CUREENT, but for some reasons I wanna it be something like
> > 6.1-RELEASE, while the kernel itself does't change from 7.
At 9:05 AM -0400 8/25/06, John Baldwin wrote:
On 24 August 2006, Julian Elischer wrote in a cvs-commit log:
>
> Add an option to allow copying of a hierarchy while
> linking he regular files.
Very good for commiting this -- except that I'm not quite
sure that log-message is parseable! From
Hello,
in the latest security advisory for PPP, the patch deals with conditions
in a for loop. The correct line is :
for (rlen=0; len >= 2 && p[1] >= 2 && len >= p[1]; len-=p[1], p+=p[1]) {
Couldn't the condition be simpler like :
for (rlen=0; p[1] >= 2 && len >= p[1]; len-=p[1], p+=p[1]){
Or is
Hello.
I did a stock install of 6.1-RELEASE yesterday and I noticed something
weird. Whenever I switched the virtual console to a different screen,
it would take almost 2 whole seconds before switching. At first I
thought it was IRQ related since it was happening during the heavy disk
activity o
On 08/25/06 11:49, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
At 9:05 AM -0400 8/25/06, John Baldwin wrote:
On 24 August 2006, Julian Elischer wrote in a cvs-commit log:
>
> Add an option to allow copying of a hierarchy while
> linking he regular files.
Very good for commiting this -- except that I'm not qu
Frederic Praca:
Hello,
in the latest security advisory for PPP, the patch deals with conditions
in a for loop. The correct line is :
for (rlen=0; len >= 2 && p[1] >= 2 && len >= p[1]; len-=p[1], p+=p[1]) {
Couldn't the condition be simpler like :
for (rlen=0; p[1] >= 2 && len >= p[1]; len-=p[1],
I got this error today, while some very heavy disk access was occurring:
Aug 25 13:47:07 snapshot1 kernel: fsync: giving up on dirty
Aug 25 13:47:07 snapshot1 kernel: 0xff01bbb99a20: tag devfs, type VCHR
Aug 25 13:47:07 snapshot1 kernel: usecount 1, writecount 0, refcount 445
mountedhere 0x
On Thu, 2006-Aug-24 17:39:56 +0200, Daniel A. wrote:
>My server crashes very often and it's very random.
...
>panic: machine check trap
...
>As far as I understand, the issue is CPU-related, but that doesn't make
>sense, as my network interface cards are constantly giving me watchdog
>timeouts.
14 matches
Mail list logo