On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:15:48PM -0600, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
>I have encountered a situation in which it would be extremely handy to
>have a generalized version of mergemaster(8) which is less specific to
>the task of merging /etc. I need to recursively merge two directories
>of source fi
[ This email edited in vim. ]
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 07:21:08PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> Have you considered emacs ediff-directories? It might be better suited
> than mergemaster for handling arbitrary directories.
No, I have not considered it. ;-)
As for mergemaster, it just about wor
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Have you considered emacs ediff-directories? It might be better suited
: than mergemaster for handling arbitrary directories.
NetBSD also has usr.sbin/etcupdate, which appears to be a redone
mergemaster which s
Hello,
It's been a while since I've been doing FreeBSD work, but I was recently
working on a device driver for the Pinicle Micro DC10+ (Zoran chip) video
en/decoder board and was making full use of the newbus system.
I've been doing my devel work on 5.0-R (I'm in Thailand right now so I
don't hav
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> So, the driver can:
> a)delete it's own children, but if it gets removed via
> device_delete_child, this work is already down for you.
If you create children then you're going to be involved in removing them.
There are helper routines that simpli
Hi there,
Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the
investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief
answer from someone who has the information.
As far as I can see, kernel modules should be built along with the
kernel for the only reason of keeping their
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the
> investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief
> answer from someone who has the information.
>
> As far as I can see, kernel modules
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the
> investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief
> answer from someone who has the information.
>
> As far as I can see, kernel modules
What we need is a way to mark some package files as customizeable
files, or configuration files. The same way that some files are marked
DOC, but a bit better: it would need to be carried to the installed
package database.
This is again re-inventing the wheel since it is exactly how Debian's
apt-g
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:39:07PM +0200, Nikolay Y. Orlyuk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the
> > investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief
> > answer
On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:39:07PM +0200, Nikolay Y. Orlyuk wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the
> > > investig
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:35:22PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the
> > investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief
> > answer fro
·Ó§Ò¹·ÕèÂÒ¡·ÕèÊØ´¡è͹
>>¼ÁÂÔè§ÁÕªÕÇÔµÍÂÙè¹Ò¹à·èÒäËÃè ¼ÁÂÔè§ÁÑè¹ã¨ÁÒ¡¢Öé¹à·èÒ¹Ñé¹
>>ÇèÒ¤ÇÒÁᵡµèÒ§ÍѹÂÔè§ãËèÃÐËÇèÒ§Á¹ØÉÂì...
>>ÃÐËÇèÒ¤¹·ÕèÍè͹áÍáÅФ¹·ÕÍÓ¹Ò¨...
>>ÃÐËÇèÒ§¤¹·ÕèÂÔè§ãËèáÅФ¹·ÕèäÁèÊÓ¤Ñ ¡ç¤×Í
>>àÃÕèÂÇáç¢Í§¤ÇÒÁµÑé§ã¨á¹èÇá¹è·ÕèäÁèÍÒ¨·ÓÅÒÂä´é
>>¨Ø´»ÃÐʧ¤ì·ÕèàÁ×è͵Ñé§
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, The Anarcat wrote:
TA>On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
TA>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:39:07PM +0200, Nikolay Y. Orlyuk wrote:
TA>> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
TA>> > > Hi there,
TA>> > >
TA>> > > Excuse my stupid que
·Ó§Ò¹·ÕèÂÒ¡·ÕèÊØ´¡è͹
>>¼ÁÂÔè§ÁÕªÕÇÔµÍÂÙè¹Ò¹à·èÒäËÃè ¼ÁÂÔè§ÁÑè¹ã¨ÁÒ¡¢Öé¹à·èÒ¹Ñé¹
>>ÇèÒ¤ÇÒÁᵡµèÒ§ÍѹÂÔè§ãËèÃÐËÇèÒ§Á¹ØÉÂì...
>>ÃÐËÇèÒ¤¹·ÕèÍè͹áÍáÅФ¹·ÕÍÓ¹Ò¨...
>>ÃÐËÇèÒ§¤¹·ÕèÂÔè§ãËèáÅФ¹·ÕèäÁèÊÓ¤Ñ ¡ç¤×Í
>>àÃÕèÂÇáç¢Í§¤ÇÒÁµÑé§ã¨á¹èÇá¹è·ÕèäÁèÍÒ¨·ÓÅÒÂä´é
>>¨Ø´»ÃÐʧ¤ì·ÕèàÁ×è͵Ñé§
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:25:01AM -0500, The Anarcat wrote:
> On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, it's all right to compile modules w/o the kernel, but that's
> > not exactly what I was asking about. My question was whether "option
> > FOO" lines from a kerne
Hi.
This is a really specific, technical question (and I think it's
fascinating to those of us who don't know the answer) about how the text
(code) segment of a program gets loaded into memory. I'm hoping hackers
is the right place for this. If not, please forgive and suggest another
venue.
H
On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:47:42PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:25:01AM -0500, The Anarcat wrote:
> > On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, it's all right to compile modules w/o the kernel, but that's
> > > not exactly what I was askin
On Thu Mar 20, 2003 at 10:15:48PM -0600, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
I have encountered a situation in which it would be extremely handy to
have a generalized version of mergemaster(8) which is less specific to
the task of merging /etc. I need to recursively merge two directories
of source files
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 01:58:38AM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
Hackers... We have spend a lot of time on coding cerb, so we count and
will be very greatful for _any_ opinions, including "it suck!".
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek
UNIX Systems Administrator
http://garage.freebsd.pl
Am I Evil?
At 10:15 AM -0800 3/21/03, Tim Kientzle wrote:
On Thu Mar 20, 2003, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
I need to recursively merge two directories of source files in
which I wish to preserve some original files, install some
replacement files outright, and only actually go to the trouble
of sdiff(1)ing t
Hi all!
I'm getting lots of kernel core dumps on my server.
My RAM is OK, I tested it. Below are more detailed informations.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I'm not yet intimate with the kernel, but I'm willing to learn it all.
Thanks in advance.
Daniela
-
At 8:18 PM +0100 3/21/03, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
Hackers... We have spend a lot of time on coding cerb, so we
count and will be very greatful for _any_ opinions, including
"it suck!".
Heh. It does look interesting, but it's always a challe
Paco Hope wrote:
> Here's my baseline assumption. If I'm wrong here, I'm only going to get
> wronger as I go:
> If I have two different programs that both use a shared library,
> libfoo.so, the system memory maps the object code they need into the
> processes' address spaces. There's only one copy
Daniela wrote:
> I'm getting lots of kernel core dumps on my server.
> My RAM is OK, I tested it. Below are more detailed informations.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> I'm not yet intimate with the kernel, but I'm willing to learn it all.
> Thanks in advance.
You posted to -hackers,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:37:46PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm getting lots of kernel core dumps on my server.
> My RAM is OK, I tested it. Below are more detailed informations.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I think this was fixed after 5.0-R..upgrade to -current and try ag
On Friday 21 March 2003 22:10, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:37:46PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'm getting lots of kernel core dumps on my server.
> > My RAM is OK, I tested it. Below are more detailed informations.
> > Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 10:26:01PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2003 22:10, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:37:46PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > I'm getting lots of kernel core dumps on my server.
> > > My RAM is OK, I tested it. Below are more d
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 07:30, Terry Lambert wrote:
> You could potentially save a lot of memory. *However*. You may
> not want to do this, since you are defeating priviledge seperation
> that is what made you want to use jails in the first place.
There's a Linux Jail like thing called vserver, it
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=41772
This appears to be _VERY_ old problem (I don't remember
it on 2.2.7-RELEASE, though)
In short: the beeper still produces noises (clicks) when
shut up with `kbdcontrol -b off`
Finally I got some time to look at
'sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c'. However
30 matches
Mail list logo
