On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:47:42PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:25:01AM -0500, The Anarcat wrote: > > On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, it's all right to compile modules w/o the kernel, but that's > > > not exactly what I was asking about. My question was whether "option > > > FOO" lines from a kernel configuration file could influence modules. > > > > I'm pretty sure they do. A great example is IPFIREWALL_* options: if > > they don't influence the module, I think we have a problem. ;) > > My testing a yesterday's CURRENT has shown we did have the problem. > Everobody is invited to set "options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT" > and to load the resulting ipfw.ko on a remote machine without human > access ;-))) [small print: it's a joke, don't actually do that.]
Woops.
--
Nothing incites to money-crimes like great poverty or great wealth.
- Mark Twain
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
