At 11:39 PM -0800 11/18/02, Doug Barton wrote:
Pardon me if I'm being dense, but I don't understand what your proposal
does that the existing interface config tools do not.
Well, it's quite possible that I am replicating some existing feature;
feel free to clue me in if this is the case.
Can y
Doug Barton wrote:
> Pardon me if I'm being dense, but I don't understand what your proposal
> does that the existing interface config tools do not. Can you give a
> description (not code) of what you're trying to accomplish?
He wants it to "just work" with an unknown card. FreeBSD does not
name
I arrived in Shipol airport thursday evening, 4 minutes after the
Hotel shuttle bus left, the next one was in an hour so I took a cab
to the Hotel instead. I wonder if cabdrivers have their own
representation in the UN ? They seem to always be aliens, no matter
what country you are in.
A bunch
Very nice report, thanks :)
just wanted to mention that i am totally unrelated to the Torino
crew (at least, as far as i can tell... unless there was some
former student of mine!) and the credit for the cool stuff
they did is entirely to them.
cheers
luigi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
>Very nice report, thanks :)
>
>just wanted to mention that i am totally unrelated to the Torino
>crew (at least, as far as i can tell... unless there was some
>former student of mine!) and the credit for the cool stuff
>they did is entirely to th
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 05:20, Rich Morin wrote:
>network_interfaces=SINGLE
>ifconfig_single=" inet 192.168.254.193 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>ifconfig_single_alias0="inet 192.168.254.199 netmask 255.255.255.255"
OK, perhaps this can be made even simpler. Put this into your /etc
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
> >Very nice report, thanks :)
> >
> >just wanted to mention that i am totally unrelated to the Torino
> >crew (at least, as far as i can tell... unless there was some
> >former
At 3:17 PM +0100 11/19/02, René Scharfe wrote:
OK, perhaps this can be made even simpler. Put this into your /etc/rc.conf
and be done:
# a hack to ease the configuration of machines with only one NIC
_single=`ifconfig -l link`
eval ifconfig_${_single}="inet 192.168.254.193 netmask 255.255.
: We're definately livelocking with the fxps. I'd be interested in your
: patches for the GigE drivers.
[ CC list trimmed ]
> The if_ti patches to add polling support are:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=407328+0+archive/2002/freebsd-net/20021013.freebsd-net
Just wondering, if it w
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:27:33AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > Pardon me if I'm being dense, but I don't understand what your proposal
> > does that the existing interface config tools do not. Can you give a
> > description (not code) of what you're trying to accomplish?
>
Greg Black wrote:
>
> Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> | I've tried a number of syntax-colouring editors, to no avail. The quotes
> | (single, double, and back) *are* balanced, according to everything I've
> | thrown the script at. That's why I'm more interested in something that
> | can actually pars
At 10:37 AM -0800 11/19/02, Brooks Davis wrote:
Once the if_xname patch is in, it will be exceedingly simple to add some
code to ether_ifattach to do that if you really want.
Well, _I_ really want FreeBSD to move in the direction of "plug and play";
this is merely one small contribution. That s
Hello-
This Thursday is the Great American Smokeout, and after 20 years, I am finally
quitting smoking. I will be keeping a daily weblog of the up and downs, the trials and
tribulations, how I'm doing it, why I'm doing it, etc. You can view it at:
http://stevequits.webhop.net
If you have any p
Wes Peters wrote:
| Greg Black wrote:
| >
| > Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
| >
| > | I've tried a number of syntax-colouring editors, to no avail. The quotes
| > | (single, double, and back) *are* balanced, according to everything I've
| > | thrown the script at. That's why I'm more interested in som
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:54:23AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> I'm trying to get some review for the following patch. I realize it's
> quite large, but most it is is trivial. The ipfw code is the only thing
> that worries me significantly. I have promised Kris that I will fix
> ports that break
why is this ent to hackers? it's a -current patch..
should it not be sent to -current or -net?
FWIW I see no huge problems.. as you say, it's mechanical changes
mostly.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:54:23AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > I'm trying to get
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:24:10AM -0800, Rich Morin wrote:
> At 10:37 AM -0800 11/19/02, Brooks Davis wrote:
> >Once the if_xname patch is in, it will be exceedingly simple to add some
> >code to ether_ifattach to do that if you really want.
>
> Well, _I_ really want FreeBSD to move in the direct
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:06:28PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> why is this ent to hackers? it's a -current patch..
> should it not be sent to -current or -net?
I initialy asked for review on -net, but didn't get any response. I
sort of randomly chose as the place to try for wider review. IMO
HEAD is frozen for the first time in years... Trolls and spammers are on
the rise...
Looks like he picked the wrong week to stop smoking.
-Nate
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Ramshur wrote:
> Hello-
>
> This Thursday is the Great American Smokeout, and after 20 years, I am finally
>quitting smoking. I
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:54:23AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > I'm trying to get some review for the following patch. I realize it's
> > quite large, but most it is is trivial. The ipfw code is the only thing
> > that worries me significantly. I have
Hiten Pandya wrote:
> : We're definately livelocking with the fxps. I'd be interested in your
> : patches for the GigE drivers.
>
> [ CC list trimmed ]
>
> > The if_ti patches to add polling support are:
>
>http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=407328+0+archive/2002/freebsd-net/20021013
Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:06:28PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > why is this ent to hackers? it's a -current patch..
> > should it not be sent to -current or -net?
>
> I initialy asked for review on -net, but didn't get any response. I
> sort of randomly chose as the pla
First off I wasn't sure which list to send this to: current, hackers or
questions; so if this is the wrong destination my apologies.
Anyway, last year, after years of using Linux, I fell in love with the
FreeBSD project. Now, I've had the desire offer my time and energy to
help development. My pro
Hi,
The following small patch to 4.6.2:
--- sys/sys/linker.h.orig Tue Nov 19 20:05:29 2002
+++ sys/sys/linker.hTue Nov 19 11:24:30 2002
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@
intid; /* unique id */
caddr_taddress;/* load address */
size_
Karl Timmermann wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to the list and was hoping maybe someone could help me. These
> commands work in Linux (and in this order), but not in FreeBSD/Mac OS X
> as the arp and route commands are different:
>
> arp -s 10.10.10.0 00:00:ca:13:4b:54 -i eth1
> arp -s 10.10.10.0
Has anybody considered that devd might be the ideal vehicle for doing
something like this?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:32:00PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote the words in effect of:
> I asked that someone with an if_ti test it first, and report
> back to me. As far as I know, no one has tested it yet, or
> if they have, they're not talking.
>
> I don't personally own an if_ti at this point.
Hiten Pandya wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:32:00PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote the words in effect of:
> > I asked that someone with an if_ti test it first, and report
> > back to me. As far as I know, no one has tested it yet, or
> > if they have, they're not talking.
> >
> > I don't persona
28 matches
Mail list logo
