On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> I thought that we hacked around this in the linuxulator 18 months ago
> by transparently converting block calls into character calls behind the
> scenes. Either this has been removed or something else is wrong.
This isn't the ca
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:47:33AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > I thought that we hacked around this in the linuxulator 18 months ago
> > by transparently converting block calls into character calls behind the
> > scenes. Ei
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:17:24AM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote:
> > Do we run on Spark 5? Someone's selling one and a monitor for 300 UK
> > pounds. Is it worth getting hold of?
>
> Not for FreeBSD (sun4u only, I believe); SPARC 5 is sun4m (32-bit only).
I concur. The SPARC port is for sun4u o
Guys,
I bought a Deskstar 120GXP that *doesn't* appear to do tagged queueing. I
was wondering if anyone else had encountered such a thing. It's somewhat
annoying; generally I buy IBM drives for precisely the reason that they're
meant to support tagging.
The device model ID is IC35L040AVVN07-0. T
I would like to ask which aspects has this patch on security of a jailed
environment.
This patch enables the use of named or ircd in jails.
--- in_pcb.c.oldMon Mar 18 23:57:57 2002
+++ in_pcb.cTue Mar 19 09:52:45 2002
@@ -501,6 +501,8 @@
int error;
if (inp->inp_laddr.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 22:34, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Sean Farley wrote:
>
> > With write cache enabled it does perform better, but I would like
> > the new computer to at least equal the old system without it
> > enabled.
>
> With all due respect, whether that's a reality is
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> I bought a Deskstar 120GXP that *doesn't* appear to do tagged queueing. I
> was wondering if anyone else had encountered such a thing. It's somewhat
> annoying; generally I buy IBM drives for precisely the reason that they're
> meant to support taggin
You think the Ultra 5 is one of the worst models Sun released? It's
not a real Sun? What are you guys smoking? Whatever it is I don't want
any. :o)
The Ultra 5 are very good machines. They are a workstation/small
server class machine and they serve their purpose very well. What? You
don't like
Hello,
Just a quick question: with the recent (past 1-2 months) commits made to
CURRENT, is it possible to use more than 1 TB of disk space? (this would
be a hardware RAID array, accessed via SCSI as a single ID, so no ccd,
vinum or other magic)
Thanks,
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://ww
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Andre Hall wrote:
> You think the Ultra 5 is one of the worst models Sun released? It's
> not a real Sun? What are you guys smoking? Whatever it is I don't want
> any. :o)
Please, for procmail's sake, take any further Sun-related bikeshed
painting to -chat. ;-)
Brandon D.
Dear All
as in stevens' Tcp/Ip illustrated says when a router see an unknown option
it must silently ignore it but when i put an option by type 253 len 12 and
10 byte of data
some router on my path drop it
how can i set an option an put 2 ip address in it that no router delete my
data
thanx
Attila Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a quick question: with the recent (past 1-2 months) commits made to
> CURRENT, is it possible to use more than 1 TB of disk space? (this would
> be a hardware RAID array, accessed via SCSI as a single ID, so no ccd,
> vinum or other magic)
The i386 port uses
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> I bought a Deskstar 120GXP that *doesn't* appear to do tagged queueing. I
> was wondering if anyone else had encountered such a thing. It's somewhat
> annoying; generally I buy IBM drives for precisely the reason that they're
> meant to support tagging.
Exactly the same
It seems Hellmuth Michaelis wrote:
> support. I asked for a cross update program to get IBM firmware; they
> had none. They wrote one :-), i got it and now my drive does tagged
> command queueing.
Well, I've always liked IBM's as well, anyhow do you still have the
update program ? I'd like to ad
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:52:37AM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:47:33AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > > I thought that we hacked around this in the linuxulator 18 months ago
> > > by transparen
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:52:37AM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:47:33AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > > > I thought that we hacked around t
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 07:50:36PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> It took a while to find, but this is the hack I was referring to:
>
> Take a look at /sys/compat/linux/linux_stats.c,
Thanks for taking the effort for looking this up.
However, the function in question - newstat_copyout - is not
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:35:43PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > Take a look at /sys/compat/linux/linux_stats.c,
> >
> > revision 1.29
> > date: 2001/01/14 23:33:50; author: joe; state: Exp; lines: +18 -11
> > Instead of hard coding the major numbers for IDE and SCSI disks
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:59:21AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Attila Nagy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just a quick question: with the recent (past 1-2 months) commits made to
> > CURRENT, is it possible to use more than 1 TB of disk space? (this would
> > be a hardware RAID array, accessed via SCSI
I hope it is acceptable to send this also to the hackers list, due to
the absence of traffic about touch pads on the questions list:
Original Message
Subject: i-Buddie 4: Synaptics touch pad FreeBSD support?
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:40:48 +0200
From: Guido Van Hoecke <[EMAIL P
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Guido Van Hoecke wrote:
> So I went to see at http://www.synaptics.com/support/downloads.cfm and
> found a pointer to a linux 'tpconfig' touch pad driver available at
> http://compass.com/synaptics/ which has not yet been ported to FreeBSD.
This is just a laptop with a touch
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:59:21AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Attila Nagy wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Just a quick question: with the recent (past 1-2 months) commits made to
> > > CURRENT, is it possible to use more than 1 TB of disk space? (this would
> > > be a hardw
Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> This is just a laptop with a touchpad. Chances are pretty good it's
> supported out of the box by FreeBSD's moused and
> ...
> Most of them just act like PS/2 mice.
Thanks, you're right: it works like a charm on the test notebook; I had
never thought to try it that
MY PERSONAL GOAL IS TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT YOU RECEIVE $60,000,000 IN 6 MONTHS OR LESS!
FACT #1
Those who "get in" on a proven successful program at it's "birth" are guaranteed
success!
FACT #2
THE UP WAS JUST BORN! YOU ARE AT YOUR DREAM LOCATION! THIS IT "IT"!
* JUST LAUNCHED!
*YOU CANNOT LOSE!
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 09:01, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> This is just a laptop with a touchpad. Chances are pretty good it's
> supported out of the box by FreeBSD's moused and even better than if you
> can't get sysmouse support that there's a driver in XFree86 for it. The
> linux driver is co
On 27 Sep 2002, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> You can put them into a special mode which allows you to do more stuff
> with them (get absolute position and pressure information and the like).
I'd love to see FreeBSD get theremin support. ;-)
[ Orthogonally cool is using syntapics touchpad output to
If you want to get tpconfig to work (so that you can customise various
features of the touchpad), I have a PR that will allow you to do this.
It is a combination of a hack to the kernel, and a port of tpconfig.
Look at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24299
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/
Can somebody explain to me how sysctls from klds are relocated?
For background, after the binutils upgrade in -stable, I'm unable to
load linux.ko on my desktop. The faulting address is always
0x9010102464c457f (oidp->oid_parent) and the pc is in
sysctl_find_oid_name().
The crash looks like th
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Sean Farley wrote:
> I just do not understand how a 5400 RPM UDMA 33 drive can beat a 7200
> RPM UDMA 133 drive by 33% on sequential output blocks.
Rumor has it that newer drives cannot write a single sector at a time, and
instead must read a whole cluster of sectors, add i
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> If you want to get tpconfig to work (so that you can customise various
> features of the touchpad), I have a PR that will allow you to do this.
> It is a combination of a hack to the kernel, and a port of tpconfig.
> Look at
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-p
30 matches
Mail list logo
