On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:42:07AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
> this is false. If you load the module from the boot loader there
> is no difference between that and having it be actually compiled
> into the kernel in terms of resource allocation.
>
> However, this is true if you intend to lo
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 06:50:09AM +0200, Christian Zander wrote:
>
> Maybe it helps to get an idea of what memory allocation sizes we
> are talking about for the NVIDIA driver. For every single OpenGL
> client in the system memory case (no AGP), the resource manager
> has to allocate ~1MB (in mu
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 16:44, Sean Hamilton wrote:
> Which card would I be best off using? I currently have an nvidia geforce256,
> but understand nvidia is fairly hush-hush about how their hardware works. I
> know nvidia is about to release an xfree86 module, but I'm not too
> interested in using
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:57:05 +0900 Hiroharu Tamaru
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Add "options CPU_ENABLE_SSE" and it should work (it seems only P4s
> > have this problem).
>
> Oh, brilliant!
> I'll reconfig the kernel and try it out as soon as I can have this
> system down for maintenance. Tha
At Sat, 21 Sep 2002 13:16:04 +0200,
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Ok. I am the maintainer of the port, and I already added a message to
> post-install (together with an update to the latest icc version).
Pardon me, I should have looked more carefully.
> It would be nice if you could send me the
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 16:44, Sean Hamilton wrote:
> > Which card would I be best off using? I currently have an nvidia geforce256,
> > but understand nvidia is fairly hush-hush about how their hardware works. I
> > know nvidia is about to release an xfree86 module, but I'm
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 00:53, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > 3d support for nVidia stuff is still 'in the works' :(
>
> http://nvidia.netexplorer.org/news.html
>
> Actually nVidia just announced that they would be doing the
> work themselves.
Yes, well maybe :)
I hope so, but I wouldn't hold my breat
* Clark C. Evans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is probably common question, but I was wondering if there is any
> temperature monitoring mechanisms out there; specifically for ABit
> motherboard (KG7).
sysutils/healthd?
--
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aagh.net
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 22:28:52 +0900 Hiroharu Tamaru
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok. I am the maintainer of the port, and I already added a message
> > to post-install (together with an update to the latest icc version).
>
> Pardon me, I should have looked more carefully.
No problem. It was fu
}jAÈçâΫÌiµ¦Mû̶ãA
·®ÉÐÌ}Vª®«o·VXe
}U[yÑ}U[ÌLéX¾©çrfIEcucð
·®ÉvµÜ·B
ܽA±±ÉÐîµÄ¢È¢^CgXgð¨èµÜ·B
ÆÉ©²ÉÈÁÄê{©çÅà¨Cyɲ¶º³¢Ü·æ¤
Xµ¨è¢µÜ·B
http://ja
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:01:15AM +0200, Dan Larsson wrote:
> While trying to get hardware monitoring to work on my computer I
> found the below procedure to enable the smbus device.
>
> It didn't get me any closer to actually monitoring the hardware with
> xbmon, lmmon or healthd. But the devic
11 matches
Mail list logo
