Ok!
I've attached the files with configurations of PCI4800 and BR500 (external).
External bridge send an error:
> E Radio Error : 3 CRC errors
Whereis problem ??
P.S. On the PCI4800 card Firmware v.4.25.30.
- Original Message -
From: "Brooks Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dmitry A.
Not sure if I should blame current - but see the errors below. I've tried
an fsck and an fsck -f from single user mode on each of the affected disks
(7 disk, mix of ide/scsi give this).
FSCK comes through clean. Prior to running -CURRENT the disks where
attached to a 2.0.8 machine; and the dump
> - run 'chio ielem' before you do anything. This may make the changer look
>at what it has, and perhaps figure out that it doesn't really have a
>source addresses for various elements.
>
> - try moving every tape in the changer to some destination and back. The
>fastest thing to
Usually remote MAC address. It's used for restricting users on a subnet. I
have an ugly hack that does this at present and am looking forward to the
MAC address support. Yes, I know users can conceivably change their MAC
addresses but most would never know how. They change their IP addresses to
ge
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 10:02:51AM -0700, Nielsen wrote:
> Usually remote MAC address. It's used for restricting users on a subnet. I
> have an ugly hack that does this at present and am looking forward to the
> MAC address support. Yes, I know users can conceivably change their MAC
THERE IS MAC
> several viruses do change the MAC address. The only real
> security is to have one user per port and filter the ports.
> Next step (but not as safe) is to wire down the arp table and only accept
> things that are in there (will be easy to implement in the
> new ipfw)
I think it would be easier
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 03:17:24PM -0300, Joao Carlos wrote:
> > several viruses do change the MAC address. The only real
> > security is to have one user per port and filter the ports.
> > Next step (but not as safe) is to wire down the arp table and only accept
> > things that are in there (will
Hello, freebsd-hackers! How are you?
I want to write driver for some device, which is attached to
standard serial (COM, RS-232) port.
I want to make this driver full-featured -- with device node in
/dev, ioctl()s and other. But I don't want to re-implement all this
serial tty stuff,
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 01:09:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Not sure if I should blame current - but see the errors below. I've tried
> an fsck and an fsck -f from single user mode on each of the affected disks
> (7 disk, mix of ide/scsi give this).
>
> FSCK comes through clean. Prior
in -current, we have a new netgraph node ng_device
that gives a device interface to netgraph.
We also have the ng_tty node that attaches to a tty
as a 'line disciplin'
adding a node between these to do you own stuff would give you what you
want.
(the ng_device node shuld be Merged from current s
On 2002-06-26 02:44 +, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>
> scott> You could simply pop up a couple directories and checkout the
> scott> given tag and date over your existing checkout. CVS is smart
> scott> enough to notice that you've already got something checked out,
> scott> and it will just upd
Joao Carlos wrote:
> > several viruses do change the MAC address. The only real
> > security is to have one user per port and filter the ports.
> > Next step (but not as safe) is to wire down the arp table and only accept
> > things that are in there (will be easy to implement in the
> > new ipfw)
> Seriously, I'm wondering what "security restrictions" are so
> onerous that users are willing to change their IP addresses to
> get around them, and why they are there in the first place?
Well in certain cases it's company policy that certain machines (ie: users)
can't browse the web during cer
Our sales aren't the only thing GROWING with this product!
Increase penis size 1-4"...guaranteed!!
For complete information on how to gain back
your self esteem:
http://www.freehostchina.com/site2/69chevelle/index.html
+++
AS Seen On TV!!
Nielsen wrote:
> > Seriously, I'm wondering what "security restrictions" are so
> > onerous that users are willing to change their IP addresses to
> > get around them, and why they are there in the first place?
>
> Well in certain cases it's company policy that certain machines (ie: users)
> can'
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Luigi is right: the only place you can really do this at this
> level is under Windows.
Don't know what the heck happened here... it's supposed to read
"on a per switch port basis". I think I lost part of a paragraph...
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC
keramida> So, the proper steps to get the files of a branch other than HEAD, in
keramida> the revisions they had at a certain point in time would be:
keramida> + Checkout using the branch as a sticky tag.
keramida> + Update using both -D DATE and -r BRANCH_TAG.
No, it doesn't work a
On 2002-06-30 10:48 +, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>
> keramida> So, the proper steps to get the files of a branch other than HEAD, in
> keramida> the revisions they had at a certain point in time would be:
>
> keramida> + Checkout using the branch as a sticky tag.
> keramida> + Update
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
{...}
> > The attached C code is a simple example of a signal handling situation
> > which works in the non-threaded interpreter, but fails in a threaded
> > interpreter.
{...}
> Try the patch included at the bottom.
{...}
>
Sorry, hackers, I posted this twice in -questions and got no response.
If the problem is newreno, can somebody say how to up just that piece for
4.4 so as to be as non-disruptive, non-dice-rolling as possible on this
otherwise solid machine?
Thanks
Len
FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
>
> {...}
>
> > > The attached C code is a simple example of a signal handling situation
> > > which works in the non-threaded interpreter, but fails in a threaded
> > > inter
21 matches
Mail list logo
