On 29-Oct-01 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 09:21:33AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>> Almost. The '2' there is a multiplier on (I think) %eax, so it uses
>> 'ebx + 2 * eax + 0xe90' for the memory address. Either that or 'eax +
>> 2 * ebx + 0xe90'. Check the gas info page for the
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:58:22PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
> Here's a proposal to cope with that. Add an optional sub-field
> to any action field in syslog.conf that begins with a slash,
> perhaps in the form `:0640:root:wheel'.
FWIW, we have a format like this in inetd.conf for unix domain
soc
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> e" writes:
> >"doc. dr. Marjan Mihelin, dipl. ing." wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> We are using from 1993 Fiskars UPS 0.8 A UPS unit
>
> Fiskars is part of Invensys/Powercom these days.
Together with a co-w
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrzej Bialecki writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> e" writes:
>> >"doc. dr. Marjan Mihelin, dipl. ing." wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >> We are using from 1993 Fiskars UPS 0.8 A UPS unit
>>
>> Fisk
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 00:43] wrote:
> > I'm trying to figure out the best way to write a wrapper around memcpy()
> > which can call fprintf() without winding up getting into a recursive
> > loop. The problem is that fprintf
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 00:53] wrote:
> > * Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 00:43] wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to figure out the best way to write a wrapper around memcpy()
> > > which can call fprintf() without
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, k Macy writes:
>Any idea why when I insert a breakpoint I get a
>SIGTRAP
>and can't continue any further? Is this a bug in the
I've seen this on applications that use SIGIO on stdin. If this is the
case, a workaround is to disable the SIGIO signal while using the
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 00:53] wrote:
> > > * Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 00:43] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to figure out the best way to write a wrapper a
David O'Brien wrote:
> > If it created the file itself, there would be a potential
> > race issue that would remain unresolved, which is hidden by
> > the seperation of the create and the subsequent signal.
>
> Come again?
>
> 1. syslogd calls open(2) with O_CREAT. At this point syslogd happily
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> * Thomas S. Greenwalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011028 23:04] wrote:
> > Are there any test suite packages available similiar to Visual Test from
> > Rational? Not necessarily with a GUI, but the ability to build test scripts
> > to test features of applications written fo
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 08:35:35AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > No muss, no fuss. So where is the race?
> > Mike had the only justification so far -- that of permissions of the
> > file.
>
> Think multiple instances of syslogd.
You are going to have to help me out a little bit more -- I can
Hello,
i really have no clue if i should mail this to you guys, but we've found some issue's
in de jail's /proc. We were able to find information about processes running outside
the jail, or running in other jails.
eg. when i run sshd in the host system, and it has PID 655, i can login on the
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 08:35:35AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > No muss, no fuss. So where is the race?
> > > Mike had the only justification so far -- that of permissions of the
> > > file.
> >
> > Think multiple instances of syslogd.
>
> You are going to have to
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 07:40:34PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> The _useful_ thing to do would be to roll the newsyslog
> functionality into syslogd; however, as a .conf file that
> is expected to be distributed over NIS, I think that doing
> the syntax change is probably a bad idea...
After see
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:16:29PM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 07:40:34PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > The _useful_ thing to do would be to roll the newsyslog
> > functionality into syslogd; however, as a .conf file that
> > is expected to be distributed over NIS, I thi
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:42:19AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 08:35:35AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > No muss, no fuss. So where is the race?
> > > > Mike had the only justification so far -- that of permissions of the
> > > > file.
Darren Reed wrote:
>In some email I received from Arjan de Vet, sie wrote:
>> I wrote similar patches (see http://home.iae.nl/users/devet/freebsd/)
>> trying to fix more or less the same bugs/problems.
>>
>> Maybe it's a good idea if Giorgos and I together come up with 1 'big'
>> ipfilter /etc/r
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 12:26:22AM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > Just to clarify. This is still a POLA violation. If a log file is
> > pulled out from underneath syslogd(8), one wouldn't expect it to start
> > logging again, even if the file was re-created.
>
> I dis
* Michael Sinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 14:07] wrote:
>
> This has bitten a number of support people - a server fills up and they
> get a bit too loose with the "rm" command and logging stops.
>
> I actually somewhat understand why syslogd does not open/create the file
> using the current sys
SIGIO is used, but only for AIO and at this point no
aio_* calls have been made.
The loop for reading from STDIN may be a problem but I
don't see how - this same loop is used without
problems
on Linux, OSF, and Solaris (although on Linux if you
press Ctrl-C in gdb it often won't let you conti
Hi!
Forgive me if i overlooked documentation and sources, but i can't find any
references on subject. Could somebody shed light if i need to lock vnode
or not to call bread()?
Thanks!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Thanks!
Precisely what I was looking for. I coded up the routines today and they
seem to work fine.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> The _THREAD_SAFE macro has gone away anyways (in -current), and we
> (FreeBSD) shouldn't be conditionally compiling code in libc dependent
> on wheth
JFYI, Brett Halle (the director of CoreOS engineering for Apple) and I
will be speaking at the NLUUG's Autumn Conference in Ede, The Netherlands
on November 8th and then travelling on to BSDCon Europe in Brighton, UK
immediately thereafter (the 9th) and staying in the UK until November 14th.
If a
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:53:05PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> If anyone's interested in meeting up with us, that's where we'll be!
Visit Oxford! We have old stuff!
--
George C A ReidTel: (08701) 200870 Ext. 26654
FreeBSD Committer/Developer [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 03:18:47AM +, George Reid wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:53:05PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
> > If anyone's interested in meeting up with us, that's where we'll be!
>
> Visit Oxford! We have old stuff!
Most of Europe is old stuff, some much older than Oxfor
Hello
Sorry to be cross posting it here BUT we did post this
to questions w/o any resolution or responses. well
actually we did get 1 response fr Kirk I think telling
us that this should not be happening in the 4.X
series.
Everyone pls take a look at this, as it is certainly a
strange 1. We're
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Denis Serenyi writes:
: Has anyone out there tried to get C++ code running in the freebsd kernel
: (like as a .ko)?
Yes. In fact, it used to work OK if you don't do exceptions. But
there are some issues with the newer compilers I've never bothered to
track down.
In message <006f01c15d7c$1e995e20$050a@LORENZO> "Dr. Lorenzo Iania" writes:
: pci_cfgintr_search: linked (41) to configured irq 0 at 0:2:0
I have a patch for this:
Index: pci.c
===
RCS file: /cache/ncvs/src/sys/pci/Attic/pci.c,v
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jean-Francois Dive writes:
: I beleive that something to do as well is to remove the RTTI support from
: the compilation ...
Yes. I also think that the default turned on exceptions, which caused
some issues. There were also a few headers I had to patch to make
t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Joesh Juphland" writes:
: 2. Somehow, some way, in upgrading from 4.3 to 4.4 on this laptop, I have
: developed irq conflicts - maybe 4.4 just arranges things differently.
:-) We now share interrupts for pccard.
: The end result ? ep0 works, on irq 3, and ep1 b
Hi There,
[posted to -questions some time back]
I'm trying to get the power monitoring functions of this motherboard going
and have run into some problems.
I've found this doesnt seem to be supported at all in 4.4 but have found
some code on http://people.freebsd.org/~nsouch/iicbus.html and att
31 matches
Mail list logo
