I just got IBSS working on a 4.4-STABLE box (in the PCI carrier,
for what it's worth).
When using the Agere (aka Orinoco aka Lucent) drivers (latest) on
a Windows box it finds the FreeBSD box as a 'Peer to Peer' network.
It can detect the network name and channel, although it takes it
a long tim
I am running a lab with 43 FreeBDS machines and will be adding about 20
more in the near future. ALL these machines are absolutely identical
except for IP address and machine name. To speed up the adding of new
machines, I envision making a duplication station, where I would add a
"new" disk as a
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:35:05AM -0400, PSI, Mike Smith wrote:
> I am running a lab with 43 FreeBDS machines and will be adding about 20
> more in the near future. ALL these machines are absolutely identical
> except for IP address and machine name. To speed up the adding of new
> machines, I en
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 11:22:15PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> imp 2001/10/22 23:22:15 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> lib/libc/net Makefile.inc rcmd.c
> Added files:
> lib/libc/net rcmdsh.3 rcmdsh.c
> Log:
> Allow users to specify a command to use as remote co
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 03:45:07PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:35:05AM -0400, PSI, Mike Smith wrote:
> > I am running a lab with 43 FreeBDS machines and will be adding about 20
> > more in the near future. ALL these machines are absolutely identical
> > except for IP
"PSI, Mike Smith" wrote:
>
> I am running a lab with 43 FreeBDS machines and will be adding about 20
> more in the near future. ALL these machines are absolutely identical
> except for IP address and machine name. To speed up the adding of new
> machines, I envision making a duplication station,
Norton Ghost v6.0 ou v7.0 will do...
I am not on the Symantec payroll in any way... :)
- Original Message -
From: "PSI, Mike Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:35 PM
Subject: Duping a hard disk
I am running a lab with 43 FreeBDS machin
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:35:05AM -0400, PSI, Mike Smith wrote:
> But alas, I cannot find any procedures for doing this. Does anyone know
> how to duplicate a master disk to a "new" slave disk??? It would REALLY
> make my life much easier.
I've done this two ways before.
1) If your disks are _r
Why not build a custom release of FBSD and use sysinstall's scripting
abilities to install and configure automatically? Then to reinstall any
of them just build/burn a boot floppy/cd and pop it in.
kyle.
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, PSI, Mike Smith wrote:
> I am running a lab with 43 FreeBDS machines
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:19:21PM +0100, José Azevedo - INEGI wrote:
> Norton Ghost v6.0 ou v7.0 will do...
Norton Ghost will fallback to dd(1)-like behavior for file system types
that it doesn't know how to read (anything other than FAT/NTFS). Thus
it won't afford you any speed or size optimiz
We netboot via PXE and run sysinstall. It takes about 6 minutes.
You can make packages out of your specialized stuff.
This make it easy to keep up to date as well as build.
You don't need to worry about the drives being the same size etc either,
and different config scripts let you build differen
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:56:26AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> Yay! Does this mean one can use ssh with dump/restore now?
Since when couldn't you just use:
ssh dump -b 8 -f - | dd bs=8k >
and similar for restore?
--
|| Seth Kingsley || Meow Meow Fluff Fluff || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ||
|
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Is there anything wrong with dd(1)?
A lot.
Best way I found was dump | restore, i.e.
mkfs /dev/newdisk
mount /dev/newdisk /newdisk
dump 0f - / | (cd /newdisk; restore rf -)
or equivalent ...
- yes, you can use tar, but you have to remember all the o
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:16:38AM -0700, Seth Kingsley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:56:26AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> > Yay! Does this mean one can use ssh with dump/restore now?
>
> Since when couldn't you just use:
>
> ssh dump -b 8 -f - | dd bs=8k >
>
> and similar for re
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "PSI, Mike Smith" cleopede:
>I am running a lab with 43 FreeBDS machines and will be adding about 20
>more in the near future. ALL these machines are absolutely identical
>except for IP address and machine name. To speed up the adding of new
>machines, I envision ma
No one has answered to me, so I have to ask again. Anyone, help me!
WBR, Pavel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]icq:52216261
This is a forwarded message
From: Pavel Levshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, October 19, 2001, 5:15:40 PM
Subject: u
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes:
: Yay! Does this mean one can use ssh with dump/restore now?
Yes. I need to verify that OpenBSD's version isn't too different than
what I committed. I mostly wanted to get it out of my tree (since it
has been three about 20 months.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Seth Kingsley writes:
:
: --ALfTUftag+2gvp1h
: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
: Content-Disposition: inline
: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
:
: On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:56:26AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
: > Yay! Does this mean on
Hi!
I want to install a cyphred partition on my system. I use FreeBSD, and I
want to know what software is avaivle in order to do it.
I heard about CFS and TCFS (but this is not still supported by FreeBSD), is
there any better bet? If anyone know any good resource (sites, papers, ...)
on these t
This is the way I'd reccomend doing it. Getting the initial bits in
place can be a pain but once that's done it's a cinch and very fast and
easy to maintain.
-Bill
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 09:11:10AM -0500, Pete McKenna wrote:
> We netboot via PXE and run sysinstall. It takes about 6 minutes.
> Y
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:25:40AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> I just got IBSS working on a 4.4-STABLE box (in the PCI carrier,
> for what it's worth).
Ooh! Ooh! Which one? The card I was using a few weeks ago was never
detected (I think it was a Lucent card of some sort but of course I've
mi
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:03:46AM -0700, Bill Swingle wrote:
> > I just got IBSS working on a 4.4-STABLE box (in the PCI carrier,
> > for what it's worth).
>
> Ooh! Ooh! Which one? The card I was using a few weeks ago was never
> detected (I think it was a Lucent card of some sort but of course
Currently getenv_quad() claims to return a quad_t, but it's actual return value
is 1 if it found the environment variable in question and converted it ok and 0
if it didn't. getenv_int() has the same return value. I'd like to apply the
same to TUNABLE_*_FETCH so that one can do:
if (TUN
Subscribe Dan Gold
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
John Baldwin wrote:
> Also, one final note about using do { } while(0). If you actually read
> style(9), you will see that you are supposed to use it for compound statement
s,
> not just for any macro that happens to be more than one line long. If the
> macro's body is a single statement, i
On 23-Oct-01 Peter Wemm wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> Also, one final note about using do { } while(0). If you actually read
>> style(9), you will see that you are supposed to use it for compound
>> statement
> s,
>> not just for any macro that happens to be more than one line long. If
Anyone object greatly to making a change to the sx(9) API to use an sx_assert()
function similar to mtx_assert() for mutexes instead of having several
SX_ASSERT_FOO macros?
Here is what the new API would look like:
sx_assert(&foo_lock, SX_LOCKED);
sx_assert(&bar_lock, SX_SLOCKED)
I am strongly suport the change :) I had to implement similar function
for an unnamed product port for FreeBSD and your changes will definitely
minimize my diffs.
On 23-Oct-2001 John Baldwin wrote:
> Anyone object greatly to making a change to the sx(9) API to use an
> sx_assert()
> function simi
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, PSI, Mike Smith wrote:
> I am running a lab with 43 FreeBDS machines and will be adding about 20
> more in the near future. ALL these machines are absolutely identical
> except for IP address and machine name. To speed up the adding of new
> machines, I envision making a dupl
There was a discussion on -mobile about this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=9p26gi%241ehb%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw
- Willem van Engen
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001 08:35:05 -0400
"PSI, Mike Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running a lab with 43 FreeBDS machines and will be adding
I have now successfully gotten IBSS creation under `wicontrol` to work in
4.4-RELEASE (using the -c 1 command line switch).
This is my procedure:
- configure interface wi0 with an address (through rc.conf or ifconfig)
- wicontrol -c 1 -p 1 -n netname -q netname -s computername
Note: the above
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 03:55:49PM -0700, John Kozubik wrote:
> output in FreeBSD will report "No Carrier". Therefore, I thought I had
For what it's worth, mine oscellates between "aassociated" and "no
carrier". Also, the 'signal' and 'noise' parameters from wicontrol
on FreeBSD seem to accurat
> You will also have an indication that it is working based on rapid
> flashing of the activity light on the Lucent/Agere/Orinico/(insert OEM'd
> version of that card here).
I've heard that IBSS creation requires firmware version at least 6.04
(6.16 and higher would be better). All Agere/Orinoco
> For what it's worth, mine oscellates between "aassociated" and "no
> carrier". Also, the 'signal' and 'noise' parameters from wicontrol
> on FreeBSD seem to accurately represent link quality (from my simple
> walk away, walk towards) testing. The lucent drivers on my windows
> box always sho
On 23-Oct-01 Leo Bicknell wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 03:55:49PM -0700, John Kozubik wrote:
>> output in FreeBSD will report "No Carrier". Therefore, I thought I had
>
> For what it's worth, mine oscellates between "aassociated" and "no
> carrier". Also, the 'signal' and 'noise' parameter
There is some movement on this as the guy who was in charge of
negotiating with lucent (it needs different firmware)
recently started to spend more time on it.
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 23-Oct-01 Leo Bicknell wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 03:55:49PM -0700, John Kozubi
[forwarded to -hackers]
---
Jonathan Slivko - 4EverMail.COM - www.4evermail.com
Web Hosting - Web Desgin - UNIX Shell Accounts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone: (212) 663-1109
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
While I've been coding for a long time, and am fairly decent at coding in
the kernel, I've never really had a chance to get into sockets
programming. So I thought I'd write a simple set of programs to see how
things work. From what I understand, when you read on a socket, you have
to do it in a lo
* Kenneth Wayne Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011023 20:22] wrote:
> While I've been coding for a long time, and am fairly decent at coding in
> the kernel, I've never really had a chance to get into sockets
> programming. So I thought I'd write a simple set of programs to see how
> things work. Fro
Hi,
You have said that reader exits when there is no more data to read, and that
does not necessarily mean it has read all data being written by writer. And
if the reader exits before writer finishes sending all data, it will give
you a broken pipe. You have to either make the no. of bytes being
Shoichi Sakane wrote:
> > While investigating a problem, I noticed that the IPSEC code
> > is initializing the sp -- even when no one is using IPSEC.
>
> > It turns out that this really, really bloats the per socket
> > memory requirements, with the only real result being a lot
> > of extra proce
Jesús Arnáiz wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I want to install a cyphred partition on my system. I use FreeBSD, and I
> want to know what software is avaivle in order to do it.
>
> I heard about CFS and TCFS (but this is not still supported by FreeBSD), is
> there any better bet? If anyone know any good res
42 matches
Mail list logo
