I am strongly suport the change :) I had to implement similar function for an unnamed product port for FreeBSD and your changes will definitely minimize my diffs.
On 23-Oct-2001 John Baldwin wrote: > Anyone object greatly to making a change to the sx(9) API to use an > sx_assert() > function similar to mtx_assert() for mutexes instead of having > several > SX_ASSERT_FOO macros? > > Here is what the new API would look like: > > sx_assert(&foo_lock, SX_LOCKED); > sx_assert(&bar_lock, SX_SLOCKED); > > vs. > > SX_ASSERT_LOCKED(&foo_lock); > SX_ASSERT_SLOCKED(&bar_lock); > > -- > > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message -------------------------------------------- E-Mail: Alexander N. Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 23-Oct-2001 Time: 14:00:00 -------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
