Oh god, as everybody else is saying, I can't believe I'm getting involved
in this, but...
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:58:21AM -0700, a little birdie told me
that Richard Hodges remarked
>
> Why not parse it literally? For instance, http://www.ufp.org
> would imply TCP, dest port 80, and host www
Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile?
Should I also extend it to support bzip2'ed dumps now that that's in
the base system, or would that be overkill?
Kris
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /mnt/ncvs/src/sbin/savecore
Hello,
since I recompiled my system and my kernel, ipnat device doesn't work
anymore:
#ipnat
/dev/ipnat: open: Device not configured
#ipfstat
open: Device not configured
...
I've got in kernel config:
options IPFILTER#ipfilter support
options IPFILTER_LOG
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I see (amost).
> >
> > Please format the macro the same as the other macros in the file.
>
> Index: apic_vector.s
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/isa/apic_vector.s,v
> retrie
- Forwarded message from Kevin Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 06:34:26 +
From: Kevin Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gordon Tetlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: import NetBSD rc system
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:10:43PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> Here's my big que
It's that time again! I'm in the process of preparing the August, 2001
FreeBSD monthly status report, and as such am interested in seeing
submissions in much the same style as previous months. Generally, this
means about one paragraph of text per project describing events that have
occured sinc
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:19:47AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> It's that time again! I'm in the process of preparing the August, 2001
^^
September one probably ;)
Joe
PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 04:57:26PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:19:47AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> >
> > It's that time again! I'm in the process of preparing the August, 2001
> ^^
> September one
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 12:11:30AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Laurence Berland writes:
> > Optimally, you could write a urlsh or something, and leave everyone else
> > alone. The shell could do substitutions on URLs just like they do on
> > wildcards etc, and the applications would not nee
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 02:15:09PM -0400, Michael Sinz wrote:
>
> I too have been hoping for (and building internal tools) that work
> this way. I really wish you could just do:
>
> open("nfs://server.name.dom/directory/file.txt")
NAME
amd - automatically mount file systems
...
DESC
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile?
Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-)
> Should I also extend it to support bzip2'ed dumps now that that's in
> the base system, or wou
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:58:21AM -0700, Richard Hodges wrote:
> > > On the other hand, what exactly is http://www.ufp.org supposed to be useful
> > > for when www.ufp.org is the same thing.
> >
> > Why not parse it literally? For instance, http://ww
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > For traceroute, I want to send a series of TCP SYN packets to
> > www.ufp.org, port 80 with increasing TTL values. Perhaps this
>
> No, it doesn't.
> http://www.ufp.org/ does NOT mean TCP port 80.
> www.ufp.org:80 means port 80, I don't know of a
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:29:18PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile?
>
> Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-)
:-)
> > Should I also
Hey,
I have a question about sysent. If a modification
to a processes p->p_sysent and associated substructures
are made, are the changes propagated through fork
to children?
Thanks,
Evan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the mess
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 08:33:36PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Well, since it didn't, I might as well explain the problem here too.
> There are at least two major problems with VIA chips:
[data curruption on VIA KT133/133A systems by pushing PCI and memory bus]
Are you sure about that?
I
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> What is the file system that uses VT_TFS in vnode.h? Is it still available
> on FreeBSD? Thanks.
This type of filesystem was used by netcon package
(http://www.netcon.com). However there is no new versions for FreeBSD
above 2.x, so it probably
Nobody's formally asked the release engineers yet. I'd want to see a
request sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the usual way, with diffs attached,
before I'd decide either way.
- Jordan
From: Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Clock speedup on 4.X FreeBSD SMP and serverworks chipset
Date:
> The other macros also have a space befor the semicolons :). Otherwise OK.
> Better commit this (especially to 4.4R) until we have something better.
I also think that this is important to have fixed. Without this fix,
we would have been forced to change the platform for our software to a
worki
The new P4s are shipping with 800mhz RAMBUS memory modules. Wouldn't 2GB of
800mhz RAM go a long way to evening out the performance between a PC/FreeBSD
box and all but the most specialized, packet-pushing ASICs?
I was doing some rough figuring, and could see how a P4 with its new bus and
memory
Hello!
According to UNPv1 SO_REUSEPORT on UDP sockets can be used to bind more than
one socket to the same port (even with same source ip address). But quick
look on /sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c function udp_input() shows that this will
work as expected (data stream duplicate) only on multicast/
21 matches
Mail list logo
