>
> I'm currently looking at how various operating systems react to a 'ICMP
> administratively prohibited'.
>
> My motivation is setup's where access to the primary mailserver is
> blocked by filters (usually to block open relay's), and all mail has to
> go via the backup MX, a example from a cu
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 06:12:49PM -0600, Mohit Aron wrote:
>Hi,
> does anyone know of a slab allocator implementation for BSD ? Linux
>now supports a slab allocator in the kernel for efficient allocation and
>deallocation of memory objects.
FreeBSD supports this as well with the zone alloc
Greetings!
I'am developing the single thread http
server
which uses kqueue/kevent for both
sockets
and async file reads. It works just fine and
I thought
I 'd be able to do all the stuff with one
thread until it
comes to proper socket closing.
As far as I understand the only way for
se
Hi,
I was wondering if it was reasonnable to implement the select() and poll()
system calls as kqueue()/kevent() wrappers. This would make any application
using these system calls benefit from the performance improvements of the new
kernel thread.
Do you think it's possible and that it w
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 02:29:04PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Jesper Skriver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001117 12:11] wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > This timeout could be avoided if the sending mail server reacted to the
> > 'ICMP administratively prohibited' they got from our router.
> [snip]
> >
>
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 10:19:01AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> >
> > I'm currently looking at how various operating systems react to a 'ICMP
> > administratively prohibited'.
> >
> > My motivation is setup's where access to the primary mailserver is
> > blocked by filters (usually to block open rel
Your Mortgage Options
www.captainmortgage.co.uk
~~~
Make an appointment for any of the following mortgage services and we will give
you a £10 flight to New York *Terms and Conditions apply check website for details
At 04:28 PM 11/17/2000, Schmalzbauer, Harald wrote:
>I just heard that Intel doesn't supply documentation on ther chipset and the
>FreeBSD and Linux support is quiet bad. The Netgear GA620 is said to be
>twice as fast. The same Chipset (Alteon Tigon/AceNIC) is on the 3com985.
Are all of the card
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 02:29:04PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > Probably not, what if one started a stream of spoofed ICMP lying
> > about the state of the route between the two machines? I have
> > the impression that the Linux box wouldn
* Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001118 06:03] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if it was reasonnable to implement the select() and poll()
> system calls as kqueue()/kevent() wrappers. This would make any application
> using these system calls benefit from the performance improvements
* Jesper Skriver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001118 06:54] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 02:29:04PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Jesper Skriver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001117 12:11] wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > This timeout could be avoided if the sending mail server reacted to the
> > > 'ICMP
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 11:04:55AM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 02:29:04PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > >
> > > Probably not, what if one started a stream of spoofed ICMP lying
> > > about the state of the route
* Jesper Skriver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001118 09:36] wrote:
>
> Which is not a option in this case, and in the real world it's that
> uncommon.
>
> I'll see if I can get code together which will do this.
>
> If we leave this off by default, would people object to putting in
> this functionality
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> > or just stop filtering totally.
>
> Which is not a option in this case, and in the real world it's that
> uncommon.
>
> I'll see if I can get code together which will do this.
>
> If we leave this off by default, would people object to putting in
I have set up a tape drive, correctly I believe, yet I keep getting
"device not configured" errors from it. See:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2849646+2851949+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-questions/20001029.freebsd-questions
Some have said that this error indicates no tapes
Try an
mt -f /dev/nrsa0 status
and
mt -f /dev/nrsa1 status
The ctl node specifically makes no access to the device.
If there is indeed a tape inserted, build a CAMDEBUG kernel,
boot it, and do
camcontrol debug -Ic b:t:l
(b = bus, t = target, l = lun)
and then do the 'mt status' dance as a
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 03:18:36PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote:
>
> > > or just stop filtering totally.
> >
> > Which is not a option in this case, and in the real world it's that
> > uncommon.
> >
> > I'll see if I can get code together which wi
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 11:33:29 -0500, Dennis wrote:
> At 04:28 PM 11/17/2000, Schmalzbauer, Harald wrote:
> >I just heard that Intel doesn't supply documentation on ther chipset and the
> >FreeBSD and Linux support is quiet bad. The Netgear GA620 is said to be
> >twice as fast. The same Chipset
>
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 02:29:04PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > >
> > > Probably not, what if one started a stream of spoofed ICMP lying
> > > about the state of the route between the two machines? I have
> > > the impression that the
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 02:27:31PM +0100, Koster, K.J. wrote:
> If there are people who are cleaning up the support for older network cards
> in FreeBSD I'd like to help out by sending you my old NICs. It's not like
> they're any good to me without OS support.
>
> Please contact me off-list for
> > Both, but I may do either way, depending on which way is easier.
> > If we can directly DMA from a disk drive to a NIC, that will be great.
> > If the current implementation requires preloaded buffer, that works.
> > So, where can I look for the patch?
> >
>
> Please see sendfile(2).
>> > Both, but I may do either way, depending on which way is easier.
>> > If we can directly DMA from a disk drive to a NIC, that will be great.
>> > If the current implementation requires preloaded buffer, that works.
>> > So, where can I look for the patch?
>> >
>>
>> Please see sendf
22 matches
Mail list logo
