* Jesper Skriver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001118 09:36] wrote: > > Which is not a option in this case, and in the real world it's that > uncommon. > > I'll see if I can get code together which will do this. > > If we leave this off by default, would people object to putting in > this functionality ? I wouldn't object as long as it was not the default. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- React to ICMP administratively prohibited ? Jesper Skriver
- Re: React to ICMP administratively prohibited ? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: React to ICMP administratively prohibited ? Jesper Skriver
- Re: React to ICMP administratively prohibite... Mike Silbersack
- Re: React to ICMP administratively prohi... Jesper Skriver
- Re: React to ICMP administratively ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: React to ICMP administratively ... Mike Silbersack
- Re: React to ICMP administrativ... Jesper Skriver
- Re: React to ICMP administratively ... Jesper Skriver
- Re: React to ICMP administrativ... Louis A. Mamakos
- Re: React to ICMP administr... Jesper Skriver
- Re: React to ICMP administr... Jesper Skriver
- Re: React to ICMP administr... Louis A. Mamakos
- Re: React to ICMP administratively prohi... Louis A. Mamakos
- Re: React to ICMP administratively prohibite... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: React to ICMP administratively prohibite... Jesper Skriver