Re: procfs development

In message , "Alton, Matth ew" writes: >Are there any plans to expand the procfs implementation to provide an >interface that is more in line with the implementations on Unixware, >Solaris and AIX? I've been writing a simple debugger that would

Re: procfs development

* Alton, Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020402 16:18] wrote: > > I managed to glean from that the FreeBSD implementation > is basically a barebones interface that is only there for gdb to work > with. > > So has there been any talk of making the ctl file take > command/operands structs as input,

procfs development

>From colleague: Hello, Are there any plans to expand the procfs implementation to provide an interface that is more in line with the implementations on Unixware, Solaris and AIX? I've been writing a simple debugger that would be portable among those three platforms, and others, but it is based