* Alton, Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020402 16:18] wrote: > > I managed to glean from <sys/procfs.h> that the FreeBSD implementation > is basically a barebones interface that is only there for gdb to work > with. > > So has there been any talk of making the ctl file take > command/operands structs as input, and/or the status file offer > elaborate structures as output, or an lwp directory, etc?
Not really, if someone where to present a patchset and documentation then it would likely be integrated. -- -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
