On Mon, 2006-May-01 18:01:01 -0400, Allen wrote:
>Man I would LOVE to find a good sun box. Nothing huge, just a box I can use to
>toy with Solaris and oldschool stuff like early SunOS.
This won't be one box. Sun hardware and software has undergone a lot of
churn over the years and you will need t
Jamie Bowden wrote:
SunOS 4.1.4 (aka Solaris 1.1.?(1 maybe? It's been a long time now.))
was the final release of SunOS 4. It was basically 4.1.3_U1 with a
couple of other minor fixes merged in. I spent a very long time
porting software from SunOS 4 to Solaris 2.3|4|5 during that time as
we t
On Monday 01 May 2006 2:43 pm, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:29:31PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote..
>
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wilko Bulte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:23:40PM +, Maslan wrote..
> > >
> > > > On 5/1/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:29:31PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote..
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:23:40PM +, Maslan wrote..
> > > On 5/1/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:23:40PM +, Maslan wrote..
> > On 5/1/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> If you watch Revolution OS, Linus points out that his main thing for
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:09:36AM -0400, Jamie Bowden wrote..
> On 5/1/06, Lucas Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On May 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Maslan wrote:
> >>
> >> That's right, but sunos (earlier than solaris) was based on bsd.
> >> www : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunos
>
> >Sun OS is
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:47:54AM -0400, Lucas Holt wrote..
>
> On May 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Maslan wrote:
> >
> >That's right, but sunos (earlier than solaris) was based on bsd.
> >www : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunos
> >
>
> Sun OS is how I got into BSD. My first sparc had sunos 4.21 on it
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:23:40PM +, Maslan wrote..
> On 5/1/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> If you watch Revolution OS, Linus points out that his main thing for
> >> doing Linux was that he wanted something like he had used at the
>
On Monday 01 May 2006 9:47 am, Lucas Holt wrote:
> On May 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Maslan wrote:
> > That's right, but sunos (earlier than solaris) was based on bsd.
> > www : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunos
>
> Sun OS is how I got into BSD. My first sparc had sunos 4.21 on it.
> It was definitely
On 5/1/06, Lucas Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Maslan wrote:
>
> That's right, but sunos (earlier than solaris) was based on bsd.
> www : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunos
Sun OS is how I got into BSD. My first sparc had sunos 4.21 on it.
It was definitely BSD.
On May 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Maslan wrote:
That's right, but sunos (earlier than solaris) was based on bsd.
www : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunos
Sun OS is how I got into BSD. My first sparc had sunos 4.21 on it.
It was definitely BSD. It makes sense considering Bill Joy co-
founded
On 5/1/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you watch Revolution OS, Linus points out that his main thing for
> doing Linux was that he wanted something like he had used at the
> university he was at and he says it was SunOS. Sun OS / Solaris,
Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you watch Revolution OS, Linus points out that his main thing for
> doing Linux was that he wanted something like he had used at the
> university he was at and he says it was SunOS. Sun OS / Solaris, are
> straight BSD.
Wrong. Solaris is SysV with some BSD b
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 00:09 +0300, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> "incompetent idiots." quote
>
> What do you think about it?
"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak, and
remove all doubt."
--
Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting
On Sunday 30 April 2006 5:15 pm, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:09:29AM +0300, Iantcho Vassilev wrote..
>
> > Hello guys,
> >
> >
> > in bsdnews.com i found this link http://kerneltrap.org/node/6506 and
> > particulary this:
> >
> > "I claim that Mach people (and apparently FreeBSD
Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
Hello guys,
in bsdnews.com i found this link http://kerneltrap.org/node/6506 and
particulary this:
"I claim that Mach people (and apparently FreeBSD) are incompetent idiots.
Playing games with VM is bad. memory copies are _also_ bad, but quite
frankly, memory copies oft
My first impression was as of Kip...
But i think Linus attitude isn`t very perfect
The big guy is showing muscles...
On 5/1/06, Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The implementation is > 7 years old, not used by default, and was
intended for a specific application. There really isn't
The implementation is > 7 years old, not used by default, and was
intended for a specific application. There really isn't much to say.
-Kip
On 4/30/06, Iantcho Vassilev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello guys,
in bsdnews.com i found this link http://kerneltrap.org/node/6506 and
particulary t
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:09:29AM +0300, Iantcho Vassilev wrote..
> Hello guys,
>
>
> in bsdnews.com i found this link http://kerneltrap.org/node/6506 and
> particulary this:
>
> "I claim that Mach people (and apparently FreeBSD) are incompetent idiots.
> Playing games with VM is bad. memory co
Hello guys,
in bsdnews.com i found this link http://kerneltrap.org/node/6506 and
particulary this:
"I claim that Mach people (and apparently FreeBSD) are incompetent idiots.
Playing games with VM is bad. memory copies are _also_ bad, but quite
frankly, memory copies often have _less_ downside t
20 matches
Mail list logo
