On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Kip Macy wrote:
> Is there anyone in particular to whom we should write at VMWare?
> I agree with his sentiments.
I picked a likely looking name from the "contact us" page. Make
sure that you only write if you are willing to pay for the product if they
make it, and t
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Kip Macy wrote:
> Is there anyone in particular to whom we should write at VMWare?
> I agree with his sentiments.
I picked a likely looking name from the "contact us" page. Make
sure that you only write if you are willing to pay for the product if they
make it, and
On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 06:01:35PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > I just wish that it was the other way around. I'd actually run
> > NT if I could get it in a VMWare compartment under FreeBSD.
>
> You would do well to pass these sentiments on to vmware; they're
> currently counting noses in
On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 06:01:35PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > I just wish that it was the other way around. I'd actually run
> > NT if I could get it in a VMWare compartment under FreeBSD.
>
> You would do well to pass these sentiments on to vmware; they're
> currently counting noses in
Is there anyone in particular to whom we should write at VMWare?
I agree with his sentiments.
-Kip
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > I just wish that it was the other way around. I'd actually run
> > NT if I could get it in a VMWare compa
Is there anyone in particular to whom we should write at VMWare?
I agree with his sentiments.
-Kip
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > I just wish that it was the other way around. I'd actually run
> > NT if I could get it in a VMWare comp
> I just wish that it was the other way around. I'd actually run
> NT if I could get it in a VMWare compartment under FreeBSD.
You would do well to pass these sentiments on to vmware; they're
currently counting noses in FreeBSD-land to see if it makes
market sense. All the techs there appear to
> I just wish that it was the other way around. I'd actually run
> NT if I could get it in a VMWare compartment under FreeBSD.
You would do well to pass these sentiments on to vmware; they're
currently counting noses in FreeBSD-land to see if it makes
market sense. All the techs there appear to
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 07:14:03PM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
>
> I could grow to like it.
>
I just wish that it was the other way around. I'd actually run
NT if I could get it in a VMWare compartment under FreeBSD.
Until that happens, I might just have to be content with slagging
it off,
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 07:14:03PM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
>
> I could grow to like it.
>
I just wish that it was the other way around. I'd actually run
NT if I could get it in a VMWare compartment under FreeBSD.
Until that happens, I might just have to be content with slagging
it off
I've been running VM Ware under NT for a few days now, booting FreeBSD and
other OS's.
In some quick testing:
The host machine is NT 4.0, SP5, 384MB RAM, dual 450 PII's.
The guest OS is FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE, configured with the VMWARE 512MB
disk, and 32MB RAM allocated
Compiling a generic
I've been running VM Ware under NT for a few days now, booting FreeBSD and
other OS's.
In some quick testing:
The host machine is NT 4.0, SP5, 384MB RAM, dual 450 PII's.
The guest OS is FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE, configured with the VMWARE 512MB
disk, and 32MB RAM allocated
Compiling a generic
12 matches
Mail list logo
