Kherry Zamore wrote:
>
> I installed Sun StarOffice 5.1 on my 4.0-CURRENT machine without any
> modifications
> at all.. Downloaded, set the ld library path, installed and started
> staroffice. I
> didn't modify _any_ files at all and it runs without a problem as root. I
> haven't
> tried pla
Kherry Zamore wrote:
>
> I installed Sun StarOffice 5.1 on my 4.0-CURRENT machine without any modifications
> at all.. Downloaded, set the ld library path, installed and started staroffice. I
> didn't modify _any_ files at all and it runs without a problem as root. I haven't
> tried playing wit
I installed Sun StarOffice 5.1 on my 4.0-CURRENT machine without any
modifications
at all.. Downloaded, set the ld library path, installed and started staroffice.
I
didn't modify _any_ files at all and it runs without a problem as root. I
haven't
tried playing with it yet so users can run it,
I installed Sun StarOffice 5.1 on my 4.0-CURRENT machine without any modifications
at all.. Downloaded, set the ld library path, installed and started staroffice. I
didn't modify _any_ files at all and it runs without a problem as root. I haven't
tried playing with it yet so users can run it, bu
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 09:29:25PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Christopher T. Griffiths:
> > also, I did notice that the versions of the libs had changed from 6 to 7.
>
> If you have a recent CURRENT or STABLE, read on:
>
> It seems that we may need to edit one of the library aga
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 09:29:25PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Christopher T. Griffiths:
> > also, I did notice that the versions of the libs had changed from 6 to 7.
>
> If you have a recent CURRENT or STABLE, read on:
>
> It seems that we may need to edit one of the library ag
Ollivier Robert wrote:
> It seems that we may need to edit one of the library again. See the message to
> -hackers (<199909011812.oaa29...@misha.cisco.com> by Mikhail Teterin).
>
> mv libosl516li.so libosl516li.so.bak
> sed -e 's,/proc/%u/cmdline,/compat/linux/so,' \
>
Ollivier Robert wrote:
> It seems that we may need to edit one of the library again. See the message to
> -hackers (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> by Mikhail Teterin).
>
> mv libosl516li.so libosl516li.so.bak
> sed -e 's,/proc/%u/cmdline,/compat/linux/so,' \
> < libosl516li.
According to Christopher T. Griffiths:
> also, I did notice that the versions of the libs had changed from 6 to 7.
If you have a recent CURRENT or STABLE, read on:
It seems that we may need to edit one of the library again. See the message to
-hackers (<199909011812.oaa29...@misha.cisco.com> by
According to Christopher T. Griffiths:
> also, I did notice that the versions of the libs had changed from 6 to 7.
If you have a recent CURRENT or STABLE, read on:
It seems that we may need to edit one of the library again. See the message to
-hackers (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> by Mikhail Teterin).
Has anyone had any luck getting Sun release of StarOffice to work??
I have the new emulation ports for linux installed and have done the
different suggested installs with no luck.
I am still getting the setup screen whenever I launch soffice.
I also made sure that I created the .sversion file wi
Has anyone had any luck getting Sun release of StarOffice to work??
I have the new emulation ports for linux installed and have done the
different suggested installs with no luck.
I am still getting the setup screen whenever I launch soffice.
I also made sure that I created the .sversion file w
12 matches
Mail list logo
