Ollivier Robert wrote:
> It seems that we may need to edit one of the library again. See the message to
> -hackers (<199909011812.oaa29...@misha.cisco.com> by Mikhail Teterin).
>
> mv libosl516li.so libosl516li.so.bak
> sed -e 's,/proc/%u/cmdline,/compat/linux/so,' \
> < libosl516li.so.bak > libosl516li.so
> touch /compat/linux/so
jdp pointed out to me that the argv patch resulted in a slightly different
behaviour than on RH. Can someone who had to do the editing apply the
following patch, and test wether it solves the problem or? The patch is for
-current, but should apply to -stable as well.
Index: procfs_status.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_status.c,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 procfs_status.c
--- procfs_status.c 1999/08/28 00:46:56 1.16
+++ procfs_status.c 1999/09/04 06:32:46
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@
ps += done;
bytes_left -= done;
}
+ ps--;
}
else {
ps = psbuf;
Thanks,
--
Marcel Moolenaar mailto:mar...@scc.nl
SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/
The FreeBSD project mailto:mar...@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
