> Which just brings me to another point, why not just turn ssh on by default
> and turn telnetd off by default, given the latest exploit.
As Bruce already mentioned, this is the new default in 4.4.
Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the b
On Friday, August 17, 2001, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote:
> I'm saying without any intervention of any kind. -- Jonathan
Hence the part about "By default". If the person installing
FreeBSD does nothing when asked about inetd.conf, no inetd
services are enabled. This means telnetd, too.
--
+---
ROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan M. Slivko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Nate Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Matt Piechota"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Carroll, D. (Danny)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
If memory serves me right, "Jonathan M. Slivko" wrote:
> Which just brings me to another point, why not just turn ssh on by default
> and turn telnetd off by default, given the latest exploit. Thanks for
> bringing up a point that I wanted to bring to the security team for awhile.
>From the rele
"Jonathan M. Slivko" wrote:
>
> Which just brings me to another point, why not just turn ssh on by default
> and turn telnetd off by default, given the latest exploit.
Umm, because the -next- exploitable bug might be in sshd, not telnetd?
There are lots of good reasons to run ssh and not tel
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:11 PM
Subject: RE: Silly crackers... NT is for kids...
> > Even for authentication?
> >
> > I can understand using a telnet client to manually test SMTP servers or
> > other protocols, but I cannot understand why you *need* telnet.
&
6 matches
Mail list logo
