On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:44:35PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> There is always a trade off but it seems most people don't think Heimdal is
> insecure enough to disable by default. (Has it has any bugs that have been
> exploitable in an unused configuration recently? I don't believe so).
In t
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
The problem is that third party software is a part of basic software,
which functionality includes authentication and authorization for host
access. A bug in this third party software could become a reason for a
host compromise even the functional
On Monday 18 July 2005 21:14, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
>The problem is that third party software is a part of basic software,
> which functionality includes authentication and authorization for host
> access. A bug in this third party software could become a reason for a host
> compromise even t
The problem is that third party software is a part of basic software, which
functionality includes authentication and authorization for host access. A bug
in this third party software could become a reason for a host compromise even
the functionality of the third party software in not used (
On Monday 18 July 2005 18:03, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
>your right about useless things, but making basic software to depend on
> these useless things is a very bad idea. I'm sure, telnet & ssh are the
> most used applications on any UNIX system, so they must not depend on any
> third party soft
Vladimir Terziev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi.
> i'm sure most of the FreeBSD users do not need kerberos for
> authnetication.
Could you give me your fortune teller crystal ball brand ?
> If someone needs telnet+kerberos, then ok, such meta port could be
> created and this person will
Hi,
i'm sure most of the FreeBSD users do not need kerberos for authnetication.
Things should be kept simple, not generic -- this is one of the principles
of UNIX.
If someone needs telnet+kerberos, then ok, such meta port could be created
and this person will just need to insta
Vladimir Terziev wrote:
Hi,
your right about useless things, but making basic software to depend on these
useless things is a very bad idea.
I'm sure, telnet & ssh are the most used applications on any UNIX system, so they
must not depend on any third party software by default. If you n
Hi,
your right about useless things, but making basic software to depend on
these useless things is a very bad idea.
I'm sure, telnet & ssh are the most used applications on any UNIX system, so
they must not depend on any third party software by default. If you need
kerberized ssh or
Hi,
Vladimir Terziev wrote:
Yes, i deleted it along with all libs related to it. This caused
telnet/ssh/etc to stop working. So i rebuilt the world with NO_KERBEROS=yes and
now all is like a charm -- no Heimdal Kerberos and no software depending on it.
I think making the Heimdal Kerbero
On Sunday 17 July 2005 22:16, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
> Yes, i deleted it along with all libs related to it. This caused
> telnet/ssh/etc to stop working. So i rebuilt the world with NO_KERBEROS=yes
> and now all is like a charm -- no Heimdal Kerberos and no software
> depending on it. I think
Yes, i deleted it along with all libs related to it. This caused
telnet/ssh/etc to stop working. So i rebuilt the world with NO_KERBEROS=yes and
now all is like a charm -- no Heimdal Kerberos and no software depending on it.
I think making the Heimdal Kerberos part of the base FreeBSD OS
On Sunday 17 July 2005 02:26, Dominic Marks wrote:
> In /etc/make.conf put
>
> NO_KERBEROS=yes
>
> Then build a new world. That should do the trick.
This won't remove it, it will just not update it.
You would have to delete it by hand.
Telnet/ssh/etc don't have to depend on Kerberos and if you us
On Saturday 16 July 2005 17:43, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i've just installed a fresh FreeBSD 5.4 on my PC i saw i have
> Heimdal Kerberos installed on it. I don't want Heimdal Kerberos on my
> syetem! Could someone point me to a easy way to remove it and rebuild
> all software
Thanks, for the suggestion. I hope it will help me.
Why exactly Heimdal Kerberos had been incorporated into the base system? Why
not MIT Kerberos ?
Vladimir
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:56:57 +0100
Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 16 July 2005 17:43, Vladimir Te
Hi,
i've just installed a fresh FreeBSD 5.4 on my PC i saw i have Heimdal
Kerberos installed on it. I don't want Heimdal Kerberos on my syetem!
Could someone point me to a easy way to remove it and rebuild all
software (telnet, ssh, etc) which depends on it?
Tha
16 matches
Mail list logo
