:David Malone wrote (2001/06/11):
:> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
:> > I agree totally. This should have been done ages ago, I've been burned on
:> > it a few times, but never badly enough to go fix it.
:>
:> I've committed this - I'll let Matt do the MFC when he
Matt Dillon wrote:
> Umm. Terry, I really have no idea what you are talking about.
I am talking about being able to get the previous behaviour.
> What historical behavior? That FreeBSD was not properly
> dealing with SIG_IGN when every other UNIX does?
> So you are saying that
:Matt Dillon wrote:
:> The issue here is first: since we are fixing a bug we might
:> as well be as compatible as possible with other platforms and,
:> second: on general principles it does make sense to keep SIG_IGN
:> operation independant from the newer SA_NOCLDWAIT stuff. A p
Matt Dillon wrote:
> The issue here is first: since we are fixing a bug we might
> as well be as compatible as possible with other platforms and,
> second: on general principles it does make sense to keep SIG_IGN
> operation independant from the newer SA_NOCLDWAIT stuff. A program
:I really, really object to not setting the SA_NOCLDWAIT
:flag.
:
:At the very least, you need to add a SA_CLDWAIT flag, if you
:want to not have it show up in this case, and make it show
:up in the other case.
:
:I think doing this would be a mistake, since the intent of
:the flags is to have (p
Matt Dillon wrote:
> :Thanks for this commit, but it works exactly in the way, which
> :I wanted to avoid. It is something like "partially submitted and
> :not approved by me". Please, could you look once again on it?
> :Please please please... Thanks. ;-)
> :
> :- Hunk #1 from commit adds PS_NOCL
> I'll take a look at them tonight and (unless Dave wants to) I'll
> commit an update to -current and hold off the -stable MFC another
> few days.
I recieved some mail from Garrett on the standards side of the thing,
so I'll read and digest that.
I should be able to look after the -c
:
:David Malone wrote (2001/06/11):
:> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
:> > I agree totally. This should have been done ages ago, I've been burned on
:> > it a few times, but never badly enough to go fix it.
:>
:> I've committed this - I'll let Matt do the MFC when h
David Malone wrote (2001/06/11):
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > I agree totally. This should have been done ages ago, I've been burned on
> > it a few times, but never badly enough to go fix it.
>
> I've committed this - I'll let Matt do the MFC when he feels r
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> I agree totally. This should have been done ages ago, I've been burned on
> it a few times, but never badly enough to go fix it.
I've committed this - I'll let Matt do the MFC when he feels ready.
David.
To Unsubscribe: send
Matt Dillon wrote:
>
> :...
> :
> :sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
> :sa.sa_flags = 0;
> :sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN;
> :sigaction(SIGCHLD, &sa, NULL);
> :
> :zombies are still created in FreeBSD, which
11 matches
Mail list logo
