> I'll take a look at them tonight and (unless Dave wants to) I'll > commit an update to -current and hold off the -stable MFC another > few days. I recieved some mail from Garrett on the standards side of the thing, so I'll read and digest that. I should be able to look after the -current side of the patch, I'll just wait and see if anyone else has anything to add. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- [Patch?] signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) is against SUSv2 Cejka Rudolf
- Re: [Patch?] signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) is against SUSv2 Cejka Rudolf
- Re: [Patch?] signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) is against SUSv2 Terry Lambert
- Re: [Patch?] signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) is against SUSv2 Cejka Rudolf
- signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch solving SUSv2 compat... Matt Dillon
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch solving SUSv... Peter Wemm
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch solving ... David Malone
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch sol... Cejka Rudolf
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch... Matt Dillon
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... David Malone
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... Terry Lambert
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... Matt Dillon
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... Terry Lambert
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... Matt Dillon
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... Terry Lambert
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch... Matt Dillon
- Re: [Patch?] signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) is against SU... Terry Lambert