Re: setjmp/longjmp

2001-10-03 Thread Greg Lehey
On Wednesday, 3 October 2001 at 12:12:14 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > I suppose it must have been Peter Penchev who wrote: >> On Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:14 AM, Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, 2 October 2001 at 12:43:54 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On Tue, 2

Re: setjmp/longjmp

2001-10-03 Thread Julian Elischer
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Peter Pentchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Gersh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bernd > Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Anjali Kulkarni" > <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: setjmp/longjmp

2001-10-02 Thread Anjali Kulkarni
ot;Gersh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bernd Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Anjali Kulkarni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:14 AM Subject: Re: setjmp/longjmp > On Tuesday, 2 October 2001 at 12:43:54 -0700, Julian Eli

Re: setjmp/longjmp

2001-10-02 Thread Greg Lehey
On Tuesday, 2 October 2001 at 12:43:54 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:56:24AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: >>> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] >>> >>> On Friday, 28 September 2001 at 10

Re: setjmp/longjmp

2001-10-02 Thread Julian Elischer
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:56:24AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > > [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] > > > > On Friday, 28 September 2001 at 10:12:14 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Gersh wrote

Re: setjmp/longjmp

2001-10-02 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:56:24AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] > > On Friday, 28 September 2001 at 10:12:14 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Gersh wrote: > >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Bernd Walter wrote: > >>> O

Re: setjmp/longjmp

2001-09-30 Thread Greg Lehey
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] On Friday, 28 September 2001 at 10:12:14 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Gersh wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Bernd Walter wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 07:03:51PM +0530, Anjali Kulkarni wrote: Doe

Re: setjmp/longjmp

2001-09-28 Thread Julian Elischer
Yeah but it would probably be a pretty bad idea to use it without very careful thought. Especialy with the kernel becoming pre-emptable in the future.. On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Gersh wrote: > Look at sys/i386/i386/db_interface.c > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 28,

Re: setjmp/longjmp

2001-09-28 Thread Gersh
Look at sys/i386/i386/db_interface.c On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 07:03:51PM +0530, Anjali Kulkarni wrote: > > hi, > > Does anyone know whether it is advisable or not to use setjmp/longjmp within >kernel code? I could not see any setjmp/longjmp in kernel so

Re: setjmp/longjmp

2001-09-28 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 07:03:51PM +0530, Anjali Kulkarni wrote: > hi, > Does anyone know whether it is advisable or not to use setjmp/longjmp within kernel >code? I could not see any setjmp/longjmp in kernel source code. Is there a good >reason for this or can it be used? You need to look agai