On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:55:11AM +0900, To Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:25:52PM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> >
> > Dinesh et al:
> >
> > Did this problem ever get resolved? I'm tracking down a very similar bug
> > with an SBC - An Axiomtek SBC83672 Ver
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:25:52PM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>
> Dinesh et al:
>
> Did this problem ever get resolved? I'm tracking down a very similar bug
> with an SBC - An Axiomtek SBC83672 Ver.C13.10.0.
>
> Dinish: What platform are you using? You said you had a 4x re(4) SBC,
Dinesh et al:
Did this problem ever get resolved? I'm tracking down a very similar bug
with an SBC - An Axiomtek SBC83672 Ver.C13.10.0.
Dinish: What platform are you using? You said you had a 4x re(4) SBC, but
never posted full dmesg(8). Mine is a Via C3/Samuel inside an OEM network
appl
Dinesh Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i never got re(4) working, and the patch i'm currently using forces
> the use of rl(4) instead of using re(4). using rl(4) still shows
> media as none, but it works the way it should with packets going in
> and out. i've yet to try dag-erling's suggestion o
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:05:48PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
>
> On 08/16/06 20:37 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
> >If the media is set to 'none' you couldn't send anything from re(4) as
> >recent changes checks whether the link is present(Receiver should work).
>
> ifconfig re0 me
On 08/16/06 20:37 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
If the media is set to 'none' you couldn't send anything from re(4) as
recent changes checks whether the link is present(Receiver should work).
ifconfig re0 media 10baset or 100baset always returns error, so there
doesn't seem to be anyway
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:03:35PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
>
> On 08/14/06 19:09 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
> >really sucks and need much more CPU power to saturate the link.
> >So I don't think it's good idea to make rl(4) serve 8139C+.
>
> perhaps, but re(4) doesn't work at
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:51:04PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
>
> On 08/14/06 17:22 Dinesh Nair said the following:
> >
> >i've got a single board computer with VIA C3 Samuel 2, 256MB RAM and 4
> >onboard Realtek 8139C+ NICs. I'm attempting to get FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
> >working on them,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:03:35PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
>
> On 08/14/06 19:09 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
> >really sucks and need much more CPU power to saturate the link.
> >So I don't think it's good idea to make rl(4) serve 8139C+.
>
> perhaps, but re(4) doesn't work at
Dinesh Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the symptoms remain the same, i.e. IP traffic doesn't flow at all,
> though 'arp -an' does show the ethernet address of the other box
> attempting to ping this.
'tcpdump -n -e -i re0' shows nothing?
have you tried disabling rx / tx checksum offloading? (
On 08/14/06 19:09 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
really sucks and need much more CPU power to saturate the link.
So I don't think it's good idea to make rl(4) serve 8139C+.
perhaps, but re(4) doesn't work at the moment on this chipset, and i'd
rather have something which works, albeit a
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:55:58PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
> On 08/14/06 18:39 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
> >Recent changes from wpaul disabled re_diag() routine by default so it
>
> i disabled re_diag() in /usr/src/sys/dev/if_re.c, and that caused the
> kernel trap to go away,
On 08/14/06 18:39 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
Recent changes from wpaul disabled re_diag() routine by default so it
i disabled re_diag() in /usr/src/sys/dev/if_re.c, and that caused the
kernel trap to go away, as per my original email. also, see my followup
email (to myself) in which
On 08/14/06 17:22 Dinesh Nair said the following:
i've got a single board computer with VIA C3 Samuel 2, 256MB RAM and 4
onboard Realtek 8139C+ NICs. I'm attempting to get FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
working on them, but the realtek NICs just don't seem to want to work.
booting up led to a kernel tr
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 05:22:23PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
> i've got a single board computer with VIA C3 Samuel 2, 256MB RAM and 4
> onboard Realtek 8139C+ NICs. I'm attempting to get FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
> working on them, but the realtek NICs just don't seem to want to work.
> booting
15 matches
Mail list logo
