On 08/14/06 19:09 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
really sucks and need much more CPU power to saturate the link.
So I don't think it's good idea to make rl(4) serve 8139C+.
perhaps, but re(4) doesn't work at the moment on this chipset, and i'd
rather have something which works, albeit a little poorly, than something
which doesn't.
Yes. What `ident /boot/kernel/if_re.ko` shows?
$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c,v 1.46.2.19 2006/08/07 02:38:07 yongari Exp $
and the latest if_rlreg.c which i pulled down shows,
$FreeBSD: src/sys/pci/if_rlreg.h,v 1.51.2.7 2006/08/01 17:36:50 wpaul Exp $
i'm not using the loadable modules though, and am building the re(4) device
into the kernel directly.
the symptoms remain the same, i.e. IP traffic doesn't flow at all, though
'arp -an' does show the ethernet address of the other box attempting to
ping this.
the OP at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-August/027356.html
mentioned that it was working fine before breakage was introduced
relatively recently (~ 2 weeks ago), and thus something's changed in the
interim which is causing this to happen.
--
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (0 0) http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do |
| for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do |
| echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." |
| done; done |
+=========================================================================+
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
