Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:59:47 -0800 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> [making libdialog safer }
> > > libdialog is rife with overflowable buffers..I'm not sure it would be
>
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:59:47 -0800
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> [making libdialog safer }
> > libdialog is rife with overflowable buffers..I'm not sure it would be
> > safe even with this input method.
>
> Okay,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:59:47 -0800
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [making libdialog safer }
> libdialog is rife with overflowable buffers..I'm not sure it would be
> safe even with this input method.
Okay, I have another idea that might be a bit more productive, since the
code in lib
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:18:51PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> Currently, when one wants the user to enter data in a libdialog based
> program, one uses the following function:
>
> int
> dialog_inputbox(unsigned char *title, unsigned char *prompt,
> in
4 matches
Mail list logo