On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:59:47 -0800
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> [making libdialog safer }
> libdialog is rife with overflowable buffers..I'm not sure it would be
> safe even with this input method.

Okay, I have another idea that might be a bit more productive, since the
code in libdialog seems to be nothing but a huge hack. How about
adopting tvision to replace dialog(3)? Libh uses tvision, and I've
thought about writing a small API compat glue (libtdialog.{so,a}) that
would allow legacy libdialog code to be linked with tvision without
modification. The only (big) drawback I see in tvision is that it's in
C++, otherwise is lightyears ahead of what dialog(3) currently offers.

-- 
Cheers,
        Miguel Mendez - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt
        EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk
        Of course it runs NetBSD!

Attachment: msg39333/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to