Re: P5 vs Celeron vs PII

1999-06-11 Thread Wes Peters
"Stein B. Sylvarnes" wrote: > > At 18:17 10.06.99 -0500, Chris Dillon wrote: > >On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Dennis wrote: > > > >> > >> In a nutshell, does anyone have a handle on the relative preformance of > >> these are? > >> > >> 233Mhz P5 vs 233Mhz Celeron > >Last time I looked, the price differen

Re: P5 vs Celeron vs PII

1999-06-10 Thread Stein B. Sylvarnes
At 18:17 10.06.99 -0500, Chris Dillon wrote: >On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Dennis wrote: > >> >> In a nutshell, does anyone have a handle on the relative preformance of >> these are? >> >> 233Mhz P5 vs 233Mhz Celeron >Last time I looked, the price difference was enough that the Celeron >gives you more

Re: P5 vs Celeron vs PII

1999-06-10 Thread Chris Dillon
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Dennis wrote: > > In a nutshell, does anyone have a handle on the relative preformance of > these are? > > 233Mhz P5 vs 233Mhz Celeron 233MHz P5 (w/L2 cache on motherboard) > 233MHz Celeron (no L2 cache) > 333Mhz Celeron vs 333 Mhz PII In my experience, the Celeron CPUs

Re: P5 vs Celeron vs PII

1999-06-10 Thread David Scheidt
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Dennis wrote: > In a nutshell, does anyone have a handle on the relative preformance of > these are? > 333Mhz Celeron vs 333 Mhz PII For a typical job mix, it is pretty close to a wash. The PII seems to have a slight advantage, on the order of 5%. If you are compute bound