--- Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
...
>
> It may still be worth trying. I only started looking at `umem' from
> sourceforge this week, but if there is more interest in ptmalloc,
> maybe it is better if I focused on why ptmalloc fails to work on
> FreeBSD.
>
FWIW, I just sub
On 2006-06-02 16:44, Jason Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> IMHO, and purely as constructive criticism, Jason's article
>> would've been much more interesting if he had tested ptmalloc (in
>> the ports tree) and we had had libumem.
>
> Yes, that would have been nice, bu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO, and purely as constructive criticism, Jason's article would've been much
more interesting if he had tested ptmalloc (in the ports tree) and we had had
libumem.
Yes, that would have been nice, but when I tried to use ptmalloc, it
failed to work correctly. I don't
--- Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On 2006-06-01 03:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > FWIW, I'd also like to see libumem ported.
>
> Me too.
>
> I have been toying with the idea of consulting Jason Evans about
> this for a while now. If something like this starts, are you
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
