On 2006-06-02 16:44, Jason Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> IMHO, and purely as constructive criticism, Jason's article >> would've been much more interesting if he had tested ptmalloc (in >> the ports tree) and we had had libumem. > > Yes, that would have been nice, but when I tried to use ptmalloc, it > failed to work correctly. I don't remember the details anymore, but > ISTR there was something wrong with the ptmalloc port that I didn't > have the time to fix.
It may still be worth trying. I only started looking at `umem' from sourceforge this week, but if there is more interest in ptmalloc, maybe it is better if I focused on why ptmalloc fails to work on FreeBSD. - Giorgos _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
