On Monday 19 February 2007 12:20, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : At about the time of 2/15/2007 12:14 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the
following:
> : > On 2007-Feb-14 00:27:36 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: At about the time of 2/15/2007 12:14 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
: > On 2007-Feb-14 00:27:36 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: >> Changing the slot did help. I moved it from slot 3 to slo
On 2007-Feb-17 13:46:20 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, I commented out the sio driver and replaced it with the uart
>driver. Now it works fine. Thank you for your extensive help in this
>matter. So I assume that sio(4) and uart(4) are mutually exclusive of
>each other?
Yes
At about the time of 2/17/2007 1:12 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
> On 2007-Feb-16 01:36:41 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, it does not report as fast.
>
> That means it's getting a "slow" interrupt handler (or maybe none at all
> from what you wrote below).
>
>> Her
On 2007-Feb-16 01:36:41 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No, it does not report as fast.
That means it's getting a "slow" interrupt handler (or maybe none at all
from what you wrote below).
>Here is the verbose dmesg from a reboot that I did just now:
>
>sio0: Reserved 0x100 bytes f
At about the time of 2/15/2007 12:14 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
> On 2007-Feb-14 00:27:36 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Changing the slot did help. I moved it from slot 3 to slot 1. But, now
>> it's dropping characters with a port speed of 57600, and I am also
>> ge
At about the time of 2/15/2007 12:14 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
> On 2007-Feb-14 00:27:36 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Changing the slot did help. I moved it from slot 3 to slot 1. But, now
>> it's dropping characters with a port speed of 57600, and I am also
>> ge
On 2007-Feb-14 00:27:36 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Changing the slot did help. I moved it from slot 3 to slot 1. But, now
>it's dropping characters with a port speed of 57600, and I am also
>getting irq overrun errors from the kernel too now.
This is not good. Interrupt late
At about the time of 2/13/2007 10:24 PM, M. Warner Losh stated the
following:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : At about the time of 2/12/2007 10:49 PM, M. Warner Losh stated the
> : following:
> : > : sio0: configured irq 19 not in bitmap o
At about the time of 2/13/2007 10:24 PM, M. Warner Losh stated the
following:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : At about the time of 2/12/2007 10:49 PM, M. Warner Losh stated the
> : following:
> : > : sio0: configured irq 19 not in bitmap o
At about the time of 2/13/2007 10:24 PM, M. Warner Losh stated the
following:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : At about the time of 2/12/2007 10:49 PM, M. Warner Losh stated the
> : following:
> : > : sio0: configured irq 19 not in bitmap o
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: At about the time of 2/12/2007 10:49 PM, M. Warner Losh stated the
: following:
: > : sio0: configured irq 19 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
: > : sio0: port may not be enabled
: >
: > This may be your problem.
At about the time of 2/12/2007 10:49 PM, M. Warner Losh stated the
following:
> : sio0: configured irq 19 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
> : sio0: port may not be enabled
>
> This may be your problem. sio isn't detecting the interrupts
> happening on this card, it seems, from this dmesg. You may
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Rick C. Petty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Not strange at all, FreeBSD does support shared IRQs. However, the sio
: device does NOT support shared IRQs.
Yes. Sio does support shared IRQs. However, the problem is that the
non-fast ISR has to registe
: sio0: configured irq 19 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
: sio0: port may not be enabled
This may be your problem. sio isn't detecting the interrupts
happening on this card, it seems, from this dmesg. You may need to
use John Baldwin's hacks to force sio to not use fast interrupts.
This makes it
At about the time of 2/9/2007 12:00 PM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
> On 2007-Feb-09 10:27:07 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This very much does involve core because I plan on handing the modem,
>> and the entire computer if necessary, over to a core developer so they
>> ca
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:27:07AM -0800, Daniel Rudy wrote:
>
> The modem is PCI, and there is no facility in the BIOS to display what
> cards are in the system. Furthermore, the irq mapping shows irq 3-15,
> irq 17, 18, and 19 do not show on the list. Below is the full dmesg
> from the boot:
On 2007-Feb-09 10:27:07 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This very much does involve core because I plan on handing the modem,
>and the entire computer if necessary, over to a core developer so they
>can figure out why it doesn't work and correct the problem, if they can.
This is a v
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:27:07AM -0800, Daniel Rudy wrote:
> At about the time of 2/9/2007 3:05 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
>
> > I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
> > this has anything to do with core.
> >
>
> This very much does involve core because I
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:27:07AM -0800, Daniel Rudy wrote..
> At about the time of 2/9/2007 3:05 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
>
> > I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
> > this has anything to do with core.
> >
>
> This very much does involve core because I
At about the time of 2/9/2007 3:05 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
> I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
> this has anything to do with core.
>
This very much does involve core because I plan on handing the modem,
and the entire computer if necessary, over to a
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:05:22PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote..
> I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
> this has anything to do with core.
Indeed, this does not have anything to do with core.
Wilko
>
> On 2007-Feb-09 00:16:31 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
this has anything to do with core.
On 2007-Feb-09 00:16:31 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>sio0: configured irq 19 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
>sio0: port may not be enabled
>sio0: port
>0xdc00-0xdcff,0xe000-0xe0ff,0
At about the time of 2/9/2007 12:16 AM, Daniel Rudy stated the following:
> I'm having a problem with a Zoom PCI Fax Modem Model 2920A. The modem
> has the latest firmware version, but there seems to be a problem with
> the sio driver. Note that this *IS* a controller based modem.
>
Almost forg
I'm having a problem with a Zoom PCI Fax Modem Model 2920A. The modem
has the latest firmware version, but there seems to be a problem with
the sio driver. Note that this *IS* a controller based modem.
Here's the relevant information from dmesg:
sio0: configured irq 19 not in bitmap of probed
25 matches
Mail list logo