Farid Hajji wrote:
>
> > > > are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> > > > or medium future?
> Thanks for all your replies. I perfectly understand the reasons for avoiding
> GNU copylefted code like glibc in FreeBSD. Using the Hurd/Mach as kernel
> replacement for F
> are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> or medium future? Linux moved also from it's own libc5 to glibc (=libc6)
> some time ago and it may be useful to do the same in FreeBSD too.
Nope. The license for glibc is not one we'd want to use for such a
core component
> > > are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> > > or medium future?
Thanks for all your replies. I perfectly understand the reasons for avoiding
GNU copylefted code like glibc in FreeBSD. Using the Hurd/Mach as kernel
replacement for FreeBSD would indeed require addi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Farid Hajji writes:
>Hello,
>
>[please Cc: to me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks]
>
>are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
>or medium future? Linux moved also from it's own libc5 to glibc (=libc6)
>some time ago and it m
On Saturday, August 26, 2000, Farid Hajji wrote:
> are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> or medium future? Linux moved also from it's own libc5 to glibc (=libc6)
> some time ago and it may be useful to do the same in FreeBSD too.
There are no such plans for tha
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Farid Hajji wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > [please Cc: to me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks]
> >
> > are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> > or medium future?
>
> I think I can safely say:
>
> "No."
No
* Farid Hajji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000825 21:03] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [please Cc: to me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks]
>
> are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> or medium future? Linux moved also from it's own libc5 to glibc (=libc6)
> some time a
>[please Cc: to me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks]
>
>are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
>or medium future? Linux moved also from it's own libc5 to glibc (=libc6)
>some time ago and it may be useful to do the same in FreeBSD too.
No, that is no
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Farid Hajji wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > [please Cc: to me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks]
> >
> > are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> > or medium future?
>
> I think I can safel
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Farid Hajji wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [please Cc: to me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks]
>
> are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> or medium future?
I think I can safely say:
"No."
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must subm
Hello,
[please Cc: to me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks]
are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
or medium future? Linux moved also from it's own libc5 to glibc (=libc6)
some time ago and it may be useful to do the same in FreeBSD too.
The reason I'm
11 matches
Mail list logo
