Farid Hajji wrote:
>
> > > > are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> > > > or medium future?
> Thanks for all your replies. I perfectly understand the reasons for avoiding
> GNU copylefted code like glibc in FreeBSD. Using the Hurd/Mach as kernel
> replacement for FreeBSD would indeed require adding the syscall emulation
> feature like in Lites/RT-Mach, linking against FreeBSD's libc and adding
> missing functionality as stubs. I just hoped it would be a bit easier ;-)
I've never found an easy way to do hard work. I don't think anyone would
fault you for trying, though.
> BTW, I don't have any problems with the FreeBSD kernel itself or its libc.
> They are excellent and I'm using them both at home and exclusively for
> mission critical applications. Keep up the good work!
Agreed. ;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
