On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:26:57PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> :
> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : >Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: >Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : On Sat, 15 Apr 2006,
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: >Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > :
: > : > In mess
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: >Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : On Fri, 14 Apr 2006,
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: >Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
: > :
: > : > Hi,
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
:
: > Hi,
: > I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?)
: > libraries:
: >
: > pato> ldd /us
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
:
: > Hi,
: > I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?)
: > libraries:
: >
: > pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so
: > /usr/lib/libfetch.so:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 03:20:41PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >>On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a depe
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
Hi,
I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?)
libraries:
pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so
/usr/lib/libfetch.so
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?)
> >libraries:
> >
> >pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so
> >/usr/lib/libfetch.so:
> > libssl.so.3 => /us
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
Hi,
I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?)
libraries:
pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so
/usr/lib/libfetch.so:
libssl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x4816a000)
libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x48198000
Hi,
I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?)
libraries:
pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so
/usr/lib/libfetch.so:
libssl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x4816a000)
libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x48198000)
does anyone know why?
--
La prueba mas feha
12 matches
Mail list logo