In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
: > :
: > : > Hi,
: > : > I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?)
: > : > libraries:
: > : >
: > : > pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so
: > : > /usr/lib/libfetch.so:
: > : > libssl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x4816a000)
: > : > libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x48198000)
: > : >
: > : > does anyone know why?
: > :
: > : AFAIK, it's being worked on. It's not just libc either, -pthread
: > : also has to start linking to libpthread.
: >
: > We don't record libc dependencies into shared libraries right now. If
: > we did, that would create some problems and solve some problems. With
: > symbol versioning, it most likely will become moot, since we'll never
: > have to bump libc major version again...
:
: kan stated he was working on doing this, which is what I was
: referring to above.
That makes sense. If you explicitly include libc on the command line
to build the library, it is included...
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
