On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:37:25AM -0500, void wrote:
> On Thursday, December 26, 2002, at 09:59 AM, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> >I think he means text-only syscons like vtys. MacOSX does not have
> >them.
>
> I don't know about *multiple* text-only vtys, but it's easy enough to
> get the system i
void writes:
>
> > Also, X11 "feels" quite slow if you're
> > used to X11. (I'm writing this from KDE running under XDarwin on a ti
> > powerbook, 867MHz).
>
> Apple's new X11-for-Mac-OS-X beta software is much faster than XDarwin.
>
Much buggier too. And it lacks full screen mode.
I
On Thursday, December 26, 2002, at 09:59 AM, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
I think he means text-only syscons like vtys. MacOSX does not have
them.
I don't know about *multiple* text-only vtys, but it's easy enough to
get the system into a no-graphics mode.
I suppose you can simulate virtual term
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Julian Elischer writes:
> > That's with an unaltered macosX 10.1.5.
> > from the user perspective it looks a lot like FreeBSD 3.{something}
>
>
> I think he means text-only syscons like vtys. MacOSX does not have
> them. Nobody has ever bee
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:59:34AM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> Julian Elischer writes:
> >
..
> > Stick with MacOS-X it's going to run better onthis hardware than
> > anything else.
> >
>
> It all depends what you mean by better. If you're talking pure unix
> performance, then I say y
Julian Elischer writes:
>
> news to me.. I run multiple terminal windows, each running tcsh.
> That's with an unaltered macosX 10.1.5.
> from the user perspective it looks a lot like FreeBSD 3.{something}
I think he means text-only syscons like vtys. MacOSX does not have
them. Nobody has
First, this isn't quite appropriate for "hackers" - but I'll reply here
since everyone else did. Nothing like the herd mentality. Think different?
> > but OS 10 seems to lack some important features I want/need
> > like virtual terminals
If you demand "real" virutal terminals, you may be SO
On Sunday, December 22, 2002, at 10:24 PM, Steve Kudlak wrote:
David Hunt wrote:
I have been using Linux (Slackware) for a number of years on my
desktop, and have never used BSD. From what I've gathered, BSD sounds
like the kind of OS I would like.
[snip]
This brings up an interesting ques
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Steve Kudlak wrote:
>
>
> David Hunt wrote:
>
> > I have been using Linux (Slackware) for a number of years on my
> > desktop, and have never used BSD. From what I've gathered, BSD sounds
> > like the kind of OS I would like.
> >
> > I Now need to get a laptop, and have b
David Hunt wrote:
> I have been using Linux (Slackware) for a number of years on my
> desktop, and have never used BSD. From what I've gathered, BSD sounds
> like the kind of OS I would like.
>
> I Now need to get a laptop, and have been thinking of getting a new
> Mac Ibook, but OS 10 seems to
10 matches
Mail list logo
