On Thu, 02 Mar 2000 19:59:39 EST, James Howard wrote:
> The problem is how do we keep up with -STABLE afterwards? Using
> CVSup, out changes will get clobbered every time. Is there a facility
> where you can keep up with the source but let local modifications
> through?
CVS does this beautif
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bill Fenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got this program in my head that takes a CVS tree and turns it
> into a branch ofanother CVS tree (e.g. FreeBSD rev 1.7 turns into
> rev 1.1.1.7) but it's never managed to make it out of my head, so
> it must be hard
I've got this program in my head that takes a CVS tree and turns it
into a branch ofanother CVS tree (e.g. FreeBSD rev 1.7 turns into
rev 1.1.1.7) but it's never managed to make it out of my head, so
it must be harder than I keep thinking it is =)
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO
Don Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought about using this, but it doesn't appear to be easy to track
> changes to an official branch. I was looking for something that would
> be as easy tracking changes made by infrequent imports on the vendor
> branch.
No, it's just a hack. Having hie
On Mar 3, 11:47am, Assar Westerlund wrote:
} Subject: Re: Keeping using locally modified source
} There's even a hack in FreeBSD cvs and cvsup to allow you to keep a
} `local' branch that's not clobbered by cvsup, namely the environment
} variable CVS_LOCAL_BRANCH_NUM.
I thou
Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yup, just use cvsup to maintain an up to date copy of the repository
> localy and then cvs checkout your source tree from there. This allows
> you to keep in sync and keep local modifications in your tree. Updates
> take longer and I recommend updating
>
> > The problem is how do we keep up with -STABLE
> > afterwards? Using CVSup, out changes will get clobbered
> every time. Is
> > there a facility where you can keep up with the source but let local
> > modifications through?
>
> Yup, just use cvsup to maintain an up to date copy of the rep
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 07:59:39PM -0500, James Howard wrote:
> At a site I am working at, we need to be able to limit which users can
> bind a socket to an address under IPv4. Basically, bind() needs to check
> the caller's groups and if you are one of several allowable groups, let it
> pass, ot
At a site I am working at, we need to be able to limit which users can
bind a socket to an address under IPv4. Basically, bind() needs to check
the caller's groups and if you are one of several allowable groups, let it
pass, otherwise, error out.
Now, I glanced over the bind() code and it does n
9 matches
Mail list logo
