Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-30 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Polstra wrote: > > Maybe you have an old version of the driver. I have > > e1000-3.1.23.tar.gz, which I grabbed from developer.intel.com a few > > weeks ago. I grepped all of the files in it, and the word "GNU" >

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-30 Thread Andre Oppermann
John Polstra wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John Polstra wrote: > > > That last bit is incorrect. The Intel driver for Linux is released > > > under a 3-clause BSD license. > > > > I doesn't look like a clean BSD license thought... Bu

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-30 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Polstra wrote: > > That last bit is incorrect. The Intel driver for Linux is released > > under a 3-clause BSD license. > > I doesn't look like a clean BSD license thought... But it's also not > under the GPL as s

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-30 Thread Andre Oppermann
John Polstra wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andre Oppermann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the BSD > > license! (and the Linux one under the GPL) > > That last bit is incorrect. The Intel driver for Linux is released >

RE: Intel gigabit Driver

2001-11-29 Thread A180009977889
In a message dated 11/29/2001 7:16:17 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Well, let me give you something else to put in your pipe and smoke. :-) > > I've spent about $800 on a few WANic 4xx cards (used, I'll grant) precisely > because > source for the driver is available.

re: intel gigabit driver

2001-11-29 Thread Hiten Pandya
hi all... i was asking... it might sound daft... is the driver already existing in the -CURRENT repository... my main point is... when are we going to put the entry for it in devices.c for src/usr.sbin/sysinstall thanks... regards... Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-29 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the BSD > license! (and the Linux one under the GPL) That last bit is incorrect. The Intel driver for Linux is released under a 3-clause BSD license. John --

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-29 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:04:45AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > Yes, it's called the mini-iso and is basically the first CD w/o any ports or > packages. The last one I built for current that didn't include Xfree86 was > about 200 Meg. That also didn't include the ports collection or any of th

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-29 Thread John Baldwin
On 29-Nov-01 Leo Bicknell wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:34:37PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: >> CDROM installs are most likely going to use cdldr soon so we will have the >> entire module suite available from loader. For boot floppies we should >> probably use the one that is smaller on disk..

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-29 Thread Leo Bicknell
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:34:37PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > CDROM installs are most likely going to use cdldr soon so we will have the > entire module suite available from loader. For boot floppies we should > probably use the one that is smaller on disk.. but we also have the the > embryonic "

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Peter Wemm
Mike Smith wrote: > > > > > >The Intel driver will be the preferred driver for these cards. > > > > > > That still is under discussion. > > > > More to the point, let the respective drivers stand on their own merits. > > There is no need to "decide" for one or the other. > > This is, unfortuna

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Mike Smith
> > > >The Intel driver will be the preferred driver for these cards. > > > > That still is under discussion. > > More to the point, let the respective drivers stand on their own merits. > There is no need to "decide" for one or the other. This is, unfortunately, not entirely true. One of the

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Matthew Jacob
A belated welcome to being a FreeBSD committer! We look forward eagerly to all contributions you and Intel's experience with networking can bring to us all! -matt On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Prafulla Deuskar wrote: > All, > > Intel Corporation has released a gigabit driver for > PRO/1000 series of

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 06:05:01PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > you write: > > >> What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the > > >> BSD license! (and the Linux one under the GPL) > > > > > >Many Intel software product

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Peter Wemm
Jonathan Lemon wrote: > In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] > you write: > >> What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the > >> BSD license! (and the Linux one under the GPL) > > > >Many Intel software products are released under a BSD-like license. > > > >Consider the ACPI CA codeb

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Jonathan Lemon
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >> What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the >> BSD license! (and the Linux one under the GPL) > >Many Intel software products are released under a BSD-like license. > >Consider the ACPI CA codebase we use. > >> > The driver will be co

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Mike Smith
> What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the > BSD license! (and the Linux one under the GPL) Many Intel software products are released under a BSD-like license. Consider the ACPI CA codebase we use. > > The driver will be committed to -CURRENT first and MFC'ed to > > -STABL

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Andre Oppermann
Prafulla Deuskar wrote: > > All, > > Intel Corporation has released a gigabit driver for > PRO/1000 series of adapters. That is funny! jlemon commited his gx driver for the same boards just two weeks ago. What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the BSD license! (and the Linu

Re: Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Geoff Mohler
Yay..stable jumbo frames! :^) On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Prafulla Deuskar wrote: > All, > > Intel Corporation has released a gigabit driver for > PRO/1000 series of adapters. > > The driver is available for download from the following > url: > > http://appsr.intel.com/scripts-df/Product_Filter.asp

Intel gigabit driver

2001-11-28 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
All, Intel Corporation has released a gigabit driver for PRO/1000 series of adapters. The driver is available for download from the following url: http://appsr.intel.com/scripts-df/Product_Filter.asp?ProductID=415 The driver will be committed to -CURRENT first and MFC'ed to -STABLE later. T

Re: Intel Gigabit Driver

2000-02-25 Thread Matthew Jacob
It's integrated into -current now. It's also available in OpenBSD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Intel Gigabit Driver

2000-02-25 Thread Carl Wilson
I was reading the below thread. Do you know where I can get a copy of the Gigabit driver to play with? Carl Wilson Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 13:39:21 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Preliminary Intel PR