On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:17, Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Pawel Worach wrote:
>> So runtime performance is on par with gcc, code size is a bit bigger
>> so there is still room for optimization in LLVM.
>
> I don't agree on the code size. Code size is comparable. I just did a
> quick ls through /bin. Th
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Hi Roman
>
> Den 04/06/2009 kl. 14.38 skrev Roman Divacky:
> >
> >you could use llvm-ld (see the wiki for instructions how to do it).
> >there's also some
> >effort to make gnu ld usable with llvm LTO and I guess the patch
> >
* Pawel Worach wrote:
> So runtime performance is on par with gcc, code size is a bit bigger
> so there is still room for optimization in LLVM.
I don't agree on the code size. Code size is comparable. I just did a
quick ls through /bin. There also seem to be a lot of cases where Clang
generates s
So runtime performance is on par with gcc, code size is a bit bigger
bigger code=lower performance except benchmarks :)
smaller code fits better in cache.
so there is still room for optimization in LLVM.
and for sure there will be some. Good that FreeBSD will have non-GNU
compiler soon :)
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 20:05, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20090604093831.ge48...@hoeg.nl>
> Ed Schouten writes:
> : Good news everyone!
> ...
> : So far we've only done testing on amd64 and i386. A lot of ports are
> : probably still broken. Caveat emptor. Beware of dog. Slippe
In message: <20090604093831.ge48...@hoeg.nl>
Ed Schouten writes:
: Good news everyone!
...
: So far we've only done testing on amd64 and i386. A lot of ports are
: probably still broken. Caveat emptor. Beware of dog. Slippery when wet.
"objects in mirror may be larger than they appear
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 09:06:29AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> >
> > LLVM provides a linker (http://llvm.org/cmds/llvm-ld.html) but "it
> > doesn't interact correctly with conventional nm/ar/etc"
> > (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-June/005296.html).
Den 04/06/2009 kl. 18.06 skrev Tim Kientzle:
Erik Cederstrand wrote:
LLVM provides a linker (http://llvm.org/cmds/llvm-ld.html) but "it
doesn't interact correctly with conventional nm/ar/etc" (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-June/005296.html
).
In what way does it not inter
Hi Roman
Den 04/06/2009 kl. 14.38 skrev Roman Divacky:
you could use llvm-ld (see the wiki for instructions how to do it).
there's also some
effort to make gnu ld usable with llvm LTO and I guess the patch
could be backported
to our ld. I guess
As I understand the reply from Eli Friedman
Erik Cederstrand wrote:
LLVM provides a linker (http://llvm.org/cmds/llvm-ld.html) but "it
doesn't interact correctly with conventional nm/ar/etc"
(http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-June/005296.html).
In what way does it not interact correctly?
Kai Wang wrote a new libarchive
Den 04/06/2009 kl. 11.38 skrev Ed Schouten:
You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang
installed
as /usr/bin/cc as follows:
Thanks for your hard work, Ed. This is great news!
You might want to mention that a few parts are still GCC-compiled due
to bugs in Clang ( see ht
Thanks to the team for this!
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:38, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Good news everyone!
>
> As I mentioned at BSDCan, I was going to import my FreeBSD+Clang branch
> into SVN. Tuesday I finally had some time to do it, so here's the
> result:
>
> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/ba
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Den 04/06/2009 kl. 11.38 skrev Ed Schouten:
>
> >You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang
> >installed
> >as /usr/bin/cc as follows:
>
> Thanks for your hard work, Ed. This is great news!
>
> You might wan
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:38:31AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Good news everyone!
>
> As I mentioned at BSDCan, I was going to import my FreeBSD+Clang branch
> into SVN. Tuesday I finally had some time to do it, so here's the
> result:
>
> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/projects/clangb
Good news everyone!
As I mentioned at BSDCan, I was going to import my FreeBSD+Clang branch
into SVN. Tuesday I finally had some time to do it, so here's the
result:
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/projects/clangbsd/
You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang instal
15 matches
Mail list logo
