* Pawel Worach <pawel.wor...@gmail.com> wrote: > So runtime performance is on par with gcc, code size is a bit bigger > so there is still room for optimization in LLVM.
I don't agree on the code size. Code size is comparable. I just did a quick ls through /bin. There also seem to be a lot of cases where Clang generates smaller binaries. Some time ago the binaries were indeed a lot bigger, but that turned out to be a bug in Clang, where a compiler flag had a wrong default value, namely the flag that determined whether zero-initialized data had to go in BSS or not. -- Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpiIiQ7wigBO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
