> I notice that v1.10 is up in -current...does this patch still apply?
>
> Dennis
v1.10 is just a variation on this patch, with support for dynamic
configuration using boot0cfg(8) rather than by way of a build option.
For instance
boot0cfg -m 0xd da0
will cause the second partition to be i
I notice that v1.10 is up in -current...does this patch still apply?
Dennis
At 06:58 PM 6/19/99 +0200, Robert Nordier wrote:
>Dennis wrote:
>
>> F1: FreeBSD
>> F2: LINUX
>> F3: FreeBSD
>>
>> F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
>> to only display F1 and F2?
On 19-Jun-99 Dennis wrote:
> Will it allow you to
>
> 1) specify which partitions appear on the menu (ie, eliminate
> non-bootables) and
Yes.
> 2) set the partition last selected to the default/active partition?
Yes.
> Dennis
Sorry if I wasn't clear enough earlier.
---
John Baldwin -- htt
Will it allow you to
1) specify which partitions appear on the menu (ie, eliminate
non-bootables) and
2) set the partition last selected to the default/active partition?
Dennis
At 06:05 PM 6/19/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>On 19-Jun-99 Dennis wrote:
>> At 03:14 PM 6/19/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>>
>>>On
At 11:52 AM 6/19/99 -0700, you wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:26:52 EDT, John Baldwin writes:
>>Then don't use BootEasy. The OS-BS boot manager is quite nice, and the beta
>>version (which seems very stable in my experience) even provides a nice
>>colorful menu on boot up as well as a nice install
On 19-Jun-99 Aaron Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:26:52 EDT, John Baldwin writes:
>>Then don't use BootEasy. The OS-BS boot manager is quite nice, and the beta
>>version (which seems very stable in my experience) even provides a nice
>>colorful menu on boot up as well as a nice installatio
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:26:52 EDT, John Baldwin writes:
>Then don't use BootEasy. The OS-BS boot manager is quite nice, and the beta
>version (which seems very stable in my experience) even provides a nice
>colorful menu on boot up as well as a nice installation utility.
>
>And with that you can na
On 19-Jun-99 Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <199906191602.maa10...@etinc.com> Dennis writes:
>: F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
>: to only display F1 and F2?
>
> More generally, I'd like my Win98 partition to be identified as Win98,
> not . Also, i
Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <199906191602.maa10...@etinc.com> Dennis writes:
> : F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
> : to only display F1 and F2?
>
> More generally, I'd like my Win98 partition to be identified as Win98,
> not . Also, is there a li
In message <199906191602.maa10...@etinc.com> Dennis writes:
: F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
: to only display F1 and F2?
More generally, I'd like my Win98 partition to be identified as Win98,
not . Also, is there a list of partition types to ignore
Dennis wrote:
> F1: FreeBSD
> F2: LINUX
> F3: FreeBSD
>
> F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
> to only display F1 and F2?
At the moment, no. Though you could use the following patch, which
allows the slices to be individually disabled. (The B0FLAGS setti
I've bog
F1: FreeBSD
F2: LINUX
F3: FreeBSD
F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
to only display F1 and F2?
Dennis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
12 matches
Mail list logo
