Re: Build options for kernel modules

2003-03-21 Thread The Anarcat
On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:47:42PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:25:01AM -0500, The Anarcat wrote: > > On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, it's all right to compile modules w/o the kernel, but that's > > > not exactly what I was askin

Re: Build options for kernel modules

2003-03-21 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:25:01AM -0500, The Anarcat wrote: > On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > > Yeah, it's all right to compile modules w/o the kernel, but that's > > not exactly what I was asking about. My question was whether "option > > FOO" lines from a kerne

Re: Build options for kernel modules

2003-03-21 Thread Harti Brandt
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, The Anarcat wrote: TA>On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: TA>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:39:07PM +0200, Nikolay Y. Orlyuk wrote: TA>> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: TA>> > > Hi there, TA>> > > TA>> > > Excuse my stupid que

Re: Build options for kernel modules

2003-03-21 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:35:22PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the > > investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief > > answer fro

Re: Build options for kernel modules

2003-03-21 Thread The Anarcat
On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:39:07PM +0200, Nikolay Y. Orlyuk wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > > > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the > > > investig

Re: Build options for kernel modules

2003-03-21 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:39:07PM +0200, Nikolay Y. Orlyuk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the > > investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief > > answer

Re: Build options for kernel modules

2003-03-21 Thread Nikolay Y. Orlyuk
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > Hi there, > > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the > investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief > answer from someone who has the information. > > As far as I can see, kernel modules

Re: Build options for kernel modules

2003-03-21 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > Hi there, > > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the > investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief > answer from someone who has the information. > > As far as I can see, kernel modules

Build options for kernel modules

2003-03-21 Thread Yar Tikhiy
Hi there, Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief answer from someone who has the information. As far as I can see, kernel modules should be built along with the kernel for the only reason of keeping their