Hi, Joerg,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 04:43:49PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:24:44PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> > My points to have /usr/ports in the mtree is for convience that users
> > creating a jail that is intended to mount the ports tree from the host
> > system,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:24:44PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> My points to have /usr/ports in the mtree is for convience that users
> creating a jail that is intended to mount the ports tree from the host
> system, without having to create their own in every instances. What
> do you think about this?
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:24:44PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Thanks for sharing your viewpoints. Mine is a bit different:
> - Not everyone wants to build the system, especially the large companies
>that utilize some sort of binary update mechainsm.
Oops, I mean /usr/obj here.
Cheers,
--
Xin L
Hi, Joerg,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:07:32PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:52:34PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> > It seems that /usr/ports is not part of our BSD.usr.mtree tree. Is
> > there any reason for this? I'm willing to add it to the mtree if
> > nobody objects.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:52:34PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> It seems that /usr/ports is not part of our BSD.usr.mtree tree. Is
> there any reason for this? I'm willing to add it to the mtree if
> nobody objects.
(a) Not everybody uses third party build infrastructures.
(b) Not everybody uses ports
Dear folks,
It seems that /usr/ports is not part of our BSD.usr.mtree tree. Is
there any reason for this? I'm willing to add it to the mtree if
nobody objects.
Thanks for your comments!
Cheers,
--
Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/
See complete headers for GPG key and other information.
pgpx
6 matches
Mail list logo
