On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:52:34PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > It seems that /usr/ports is not part of our BSD.usr.mtree tree. Is > there any reason for this? I'm willing to add it to the mtree if > nobody objects.
(a) Not everybody uses third party build infrastructures. (b) Not everybody uses ports, some use pkgsrc. (c) Why should ports be placed in /usr/ports? On my systems it normally was under /home, allowing /usr to be much smaller. Joerg _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
