On Sun, Mar 28 2004 (02:51:56 -0800), jitendra pande wrote:
> My application uses libusb for iinteracting with the usb devices...
> libusb on freeBSD 4.8 tries to find /debv/ugen0, /dev/ugen1 and so
> onhence couldn't able to detect more then one device.
...
> FreeBSD 4.8 and FreeBSD 5.0
Note
On Fri, Mar 26 2004 (09:15:26 +1100), Sam Lawrance wrote:
> I've tried to find the answer to this but am stuck. How can I prevent a
> kld module being unloaded if it is still in use?
>
> Filesystem modules give "device busy" if you try to kldunload them while
> still in use. Any sort of quick poin
On Wed, Mar 17 2004 (17:00:02 +0200), Artis Caune wrote:
> "pid_t" is signed int type, or am I missing something?
You are right, pid_t is __int32_t, which is signed, so "%d"
is the correct format.
I assumed that in this case, the signed integer overflowed,
so maybe interpreting it as an unsigned
On Tue, Mar 16 2004 (19:39:56 +0300), Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
[...]
> printf("open(2): %s pid: %i\n", name, (int)p->p_pid);
[...]
> Mar 16 19:15:44 nov kernel: open(2): /tmp/asfdasfsaf pid: -1002890624
pid_t is an unsigned number, so try "%u" in printf() instead.
There's no need to
On Mon, Nov 24 2003 (09:25:52 -0500), Dan Langille wrote:
> We have been looking at the devel/libusb port and experimenting with
> testlibusb which is a part of that port. We have noticed that
> usb_find_devices() does not find any devices. Looking at the usb.c
> code within libusb, we found t
On Wed, Jul 09 2003 (12:45:14 +0300), Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
> Usually? What does usually mean? I know I can use bpf. But is there
> another way to look at incoming TCP packet ? What I did is I sent a TCP
> SYN packet and the server answers with a TCP SYN_ACK packet. How can I
> look at the SY
On Mon, Jul 07 2003 (18:02:52 +0200), Socketd wrote:
> Ok, anyway to prevent sending ICMP's when ttl = 0? Or do I need a
> firewall?
Yes, you'd need a firewall.
Cheers,
Toni
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
On Mon, Jul 07 2003 (01:22:05 +0200), Socketd wrote:
> 1. Reading "man blackhole" I found that net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 will
> prevent traceroute. Is this only if the host is the end target? or will
> it simply disable sending an ICMP packet when it get's a packet with
> ttl=1?
Look in sys/netinet
8 matches
Mail list logo
