On Wed, Mar 17 2004 (17:00:02 +0200), Artis Caune wrote: > "pid_t" is signed int type, or am I missing something?
You are right, pid_t is __int32_t, which is signed, so "%d" is the correct format. I assumed that in this case, the signed integer overflowed, so maybe interpreting it as an unsigned integer would make more sense. However, I don't know what could cause a pid_t to become that large. On 5.x, fork1() tries to find an unused pid for a new process and checks if it lies between 100 and PID_MAX. Cheers, Toni _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
