>
> A couple of things.
>
> - The newer rt2661.c driver has not been MFC'd to 6.2. That is most
> likely why your card is not working.
> - 'ifconfig' when run as root will load the module for a network
> driver provided it is a) in the path and b) name if_ name>.ko
>
>-Kip
>
Forent Thoumie wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 23:05 -0500, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> > I've got a Dell Dimension 4100 (circa 2000) running FreeBSD 6.2.
> >
> > I plugged in a Linksys WMP54G wireless PCI card, which should
> > be supported by the &#
Well - I gave up on the ral(4) driver - seems it doesn't
support the WMP54Gv4.1 linksys card.
So - I've got ndis working.
I can ifconfig ndis0, set the ssid and wepkey, etc...
And - DHCP will get the wireless configured (IP address,
default route, etc...)
But - on the first packet after that (
I've got a Dell Dimension 4100 (circa 2000) running FreeBSD 6.2.
I plugged in a Linksys WMP54G wireless PCI card, which should
be supported by the 'ral' driver. However, my pciconf says:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x028000 card=0x00551737 chip=0x03011814
rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
vendor =
"Randall Hyde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> BTW, if anyone is intrested in the full FLEX source, it's part of the HLA
> (High Level Assembler) source package found here:
>
>
> http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/AsmTools/HLA/HLAv1.84/hlasrc.zip
>
Just wondering if those guys knew that IBM calls their mainfra
I'm applying flock() to a file that is on an NFS server.
The program calling flock() is built on a 4.5 system,
with the 4.5 libraries, etc...
The NFS server is a 4.5-RELEASE system. The program running on a
4.5-release system doesn't display any problems.
But - when I run that same program o
Everyone,
If I'm remembering correctly - the historical way to
do this is to alias the "rm" command to something that
else that checks the arguments and complains appropriately
(and then executes /bin/rm.) Typically with just a shell
alias. That keeps you from accidently doing something.
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : to the end of pcic_pci_intr() - but that didn't change anything...
> : got the same hang in exactly t
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Warner - any ideas?
> : pci_write_config(..., bcr,2); <<<< hangs
>
> Interesti
OK - after *many* additional printf()s, and following the
control flow through several twisty passages (all alike),
I've figured out _where_ the hang is happening but, not
why...
First - the card is inserted, and the various callbacks occur...
pccardd gets involved and reads the CIS to deter
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Ok - the next question would be - is there a way to "un-do" that?
> : Since ISA interrupts w
"E.B. Dreger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
Eddy,
Instead of a system-specific approach, you might want
to take advantage of what the C language has to offer.
For example, your multi-line issue.
You realise that the C preprocessor/compiler will
concatentate adjacen
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Ok - the next question would be - is there a way to "un-do" that?
> : Since ISA interrupts work
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Also - I need to understand why this machine worked so well with
> : 4.1-RELEASE, and doesn't
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :
> : OK -
> :
> : pccard (or, more likely, the pcic driver) hangs when I insert
> : my ethernet card into the pcmcia slot on my VAIO F480 (with
>
OK -
pccard (or, more likely, the pcic driver) hangs when I insert
my ethernet card into the pcmcia slot on my VAIO F480 (with
4.5-RELEASE.)
The entire machine is hung up tight.
When I remove the card, everything comes "alive" again
This clearly feels like a missed interrupt somewh
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Archie Cobbs wrote:
> > Thomas David Rivers writes:
> > > If I add
> > > enable MSChapV2
> > > in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf - then our ppp client requires that the
> > > peer (the M
Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thomas David Rivers writes:
> > > > enable MSChapV2
> > > > in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf - then our ppp client requires that the
> > > > peer (the Microsoft VPN server) authenticate using MSChapV2
>
> Thomas David Rivers writes:
> > If I add
> > enable MSChapV2
> > in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf - then our ppp client requires that the
> > peer (the Microsoft VPN server) authenticate using MSChapV2. But,
> > the Microsoft VPN peer refuses that (it&#x
>
> Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> > From the ppp.log file - it seems I have to have MSChapV2
> > both enabled and disabled at the same time. At some points
> > in the negotiation it needs to be disabled (i.e. *not* used
> > for authenticating the peer) - but at
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've always had better success using the mpd port for pptp..
OK - I went through the mpd documentation, etc.. very nice.
No problems setting things up, etc...
However, mpd isn't working for me either. It makes it through
the authentication,
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've always had better success using the mpd port for pptp..
>
It's installed now :-) I'm going to try and "give it a go" this
morning!
I'll let everyone know how it goes...
- Thanks! -
- Dave Rivers -
To Unsubscribe: send
Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 03:47:13PM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> >
> > Well - I'm still trying to get pptp to cooperate and set up
> > a VPN connection to a Microsoft VPN server.
> >
> > I'm just
>
> Dear Thomas,
>
> >
> > Well - I'm still trying to get pptp to cooperate and set up
> > a VPN connection to a Microsoft VPN server.
> >
> > I'm just wondering - is there _anyone_ out there that has
> > met with success using pptp - and, if so, could you share
> > your /etc/ppp/ppp.conf sett
Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 03:47:13PM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> >
> > Well - I'm still trying to get pptp to cooperate and set up
> > a VPN connection to a Microsoft VPN server.
> >
> > I'm just
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> > Well - I'm still trying to get pptp to cooperate and set up
> > a VPN connection to a Microsoft VPN server.
> >
> > I'm just wondering - is there _anyone_ out there that ha
Well - I'm still trying to get pptp to cooperate and set up
a VPN connection to a Microsoft VPN server.
I'm just wondering - is there _anyone_ out there that has
met with success using pptp - and, if so, could you share
your /etc/ppp/ppp.conf settings?
- Many thanks! -
- Dave Riv
I posted something on -questions, and got no reply... so, let me
try here...
Has _anyone_ been successfull at getting a pptp client connection
to a Microsoft VPN server?
I've - at last - gotten through two of the big hurdles, 1) Clearing
the firewall to allow this to pass and 2) Getting the CHA
Theo Pagtzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I upgraded to linux 7.1 base successfully for the purposes of getting
> linux java 1.4. The upgrade has created a consistent problem with the
> locale for any application that I am running.
>
> These applications are so far, Netscape and
The machine I redirected telnet too has changed IP addresses...
And; I discovered after simply changing my natd_flags in /etc/rc.conf
that natd isn't properly redirecting the port.
I checked the messages log (/var/log/alias.log) and nothing appears
to be amiss.
(And, I've got -l on the natd_fl
> Hi,
>
> I have written some code in C++. However, I want to run it on an old
> mainframe machine, which a C++ compiler is not available.
>
> I know that the old g++ is a C++ to C compiler. Does anyone know which
> version it is? Also, anyone knows other C++ to C compilers?
>
> Thanks,
> Rayso
>
> > Since some strings are non-constant (the are allocated) - I believe
> > the `const' qualifier in the structure declaration is incorrect.
>
> 'const' just means "I will not be modifying this"; it's a way for a
> function prototype to constrain the function's implementation.
>
Yes - it
>
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:51:54AM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> > >
> > > GCC complains when I try to initialize the structure with something like:
> > >
> > > struct validation_fun val_init[] = {
> > > {"init"
>
> GCC complains when I try to initialize the structure with something like:
>
> struct validation_fun val_init[] = {
> {"init",valfun_init,0}
> };
>
> This can be avoided by:
>
> struct validation_fun val_init[] = {
> {(char *) (uintptr_t) "init", valfun_init,0}
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:20:51AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > On 07-Jun-01 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:07:22PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Is free((void *) (size_t) ptr) the only way to fr
>
>
> Long shot, probably, but I've got a bunch of virtual machines on an IBM
> S/390 mainframe, and while we're running SuSE Linux on most of them, on a
> whim I tossed out the idea of running FreeBSD on one of them, and to my
> surprise, it was taken seriously.
>
> So, has anyone done any wor
Farooq Mela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Usually when I write programs, I have functions such as the following:
>
> void *
> xmalloc(size_t size)
> {
>
> }
>
> void *
> xrealloc(void *ptr, size_t size)
> {
>
> }
>
> And then I use these instead of malloc and realloc t
Josef Grosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Does anybody know of an EBCDIC to ASCII converter? I thought that at one
> time FreeBSD had one of these.
>
>
> Josef
Check out the `dd' command.. particularly the `conv' suboption:
conv= value[, value ...]
Where value is one
Robert Nordier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>
> > > > So why is using a "char" as an array subscript wrong? I had always
> > > > avoided it because the compiler complained and that was good enough
> > &g
>
> In the last episode (Oct 03), Larry Lile said:
> >
> > ...we get scores of warnings about using characters as subscripts
> > to an array (-Wchar-subscripts), which generates so much noise as
> > to mask real warnings burried within. Therefore, I would like to
> > suppress thi
>
> > -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Peter Pentchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 1. September 2000 14:00
> >
> > man 1 logger
> >
> > pipe your stdout/stderr to logger(1), and you're all set.
> > You may even
> > specify a facility/level to log with.
> >
>
>
>
> >
> > I believe HP provides a IA64 emultor which runs on Linux/Windows? I recall
> > stumbling into when looking at the IA64 compiler that SGI recently
> > releases.
>
> It was mentioned on SGI's pages, but I couldn't find it anywhere on HP's
> site (the link didn't work). If you have
>
> On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> > Intel has furnished us with IA-64 hardware and a porting effort is
> > already underway. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you would like to
> > help out in some way with the process.
>
> What can those of us just out here do?
>
>
I believe
> My professor plans to use FreeBSD for teaching purpose. We will allow
> students to build their kernel but do not want to give them root password.
> So it's better to find a way to let students build kernel under their own
> account, save the kernel on a floppy and then boot from the floppy.
>
This came across the Linux/390 mailing list today, I thought it
might be interesting for people:
>"IBM makes JFS technology available for Linux - Technology based on OS/2
>Warp Journaled File System goes open source". See
>http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/features/jfs_featur
>
> Hello!
>
> Try the following:
>
> Take any year, minute, seconds, hours (etc...).
>
> set the struct tm accordingly.
> set the tm->tm_mon = 10 (November)
> set the tm->tm_mday = 31 (november has only 31 days)
>
> mktime(3) with this tm returns the date 1 Dezember.
>
> Does POSIX want thi
> Yes, according to the strict letter of the law, all of these other system
> include files don't even have to exist, and if they do exist, they could
> contain any garbage you want, including random binary bytes that drive the
> compiler absolutely mad. The ANSI C standard has _nothing_ to say a
>
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >... If you have examples where it breaks, send them to me, please.
>
> Here is a list of a few system include file problems, in no particular
> order. Most of these are ANSI conformance problems.
>
>
>
>
> P.S. Actually, although Martin Cracauer's suggested replacement for
> the existing Mozilla code is certainly better than what Mozilla is
> using now, it may perhaps need to be slightly augmented with an
> additional check to see if the value of `d' is a NaN prior to per-
> forming the range
David -
The man page for the ELF linker says:
ld accepts Linker Command Language files to provide ex-
plicit and total control over the linking process. This
man page does not describe the command language; see the
`ld' entry in `info', or the manual ld: the
>
> The kernel hangs (rather an endless loop) with messages like:
>
> ncr0: timeout nccb=0xc0c38000
>
> if I attach a fujitsu M2513A2 640MB MO drive. From a quick glance in the
> ncr source it seems there's a problem with the script stuff in case of a
> timeout. Anyway, this doesn't hap
Include before
- Dave R. -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Stephen McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And to Thomas: I've used dfspace before on ISC Unix, but never really
> liked it. I prefer df to do what I want. Am I greedy? :-)
Not at all - it just seems to me the question should be asked,
that's all.
Since not a single person agreed - it s
Stephen McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write
>
> On Tuesday, 30th November 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > FilesystemSize UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
> > /dev/da0s1a 62.0M 31.0M 26.1M54% /
> > /dev/da0s1e 192M 167M 9.22M95% /usr
> > /dev/da0s1d 61.4M 11.3M 45.2M
In message <19991129230436.A6501@badmofo> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: [badmofo@/home/matt] df -h
: FilesystemSize UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
: /dev/wd0s1a 722M20M 644M 3% /
: /dev/wd0s2h 9.9G 4.4G 4.8G48% /usr
: procfs4.0K 4.0K 0B 100%
You're missing a #include of
- Dave R. -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I'm trying to track down a problem in 3.3-RELEASE
(which I _think_ might be a linux emu bug that's
crashing the kernel.)
Anyway - I thought I might ask here for some
kernel debugging assistance...
I've got a debuggable kernel, with DDB.
When the panic occurs (which I can readily reproduce)
I
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Robey
>writes:
> : Uhhh? I've long since got the answer I wanted, but this seems a complete
> : mystery, so I'll bite, what's a OI_add_event? From some package? Can't
> : find a man page on it.
>
> OI was a native C++ toolkit that had a nice interface
> Then you just stick a C wrapper function around every C++ callback you
> want to register, is that it? Seems a bit inelegant, but I suppose, if
> the ultimate test of elegance is that "it's the only one that works", then
> it's perhaps elegant *enough*.
I believe someone posted a better solu
>
> On 27-Oct-99 Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> > If you mean Xt (and possibly Motif) - the answer is "very carefully."
>
> Or you could just use a toolkit written for C++ or with C++ shims already.. ie
> Qt or GTK..
>
Good point!
Also - I think there were
>
> Does anyone (anyone, that is, who's coded X11 applications) know how you
> handle X11 callbacks to C++ object methods?
>
> Thanks,
If you mean Xt (and possibly Motif) - the answer is "very carefully."
The Xt callbacks are C based, so you typically can't directly call a
C++ method.
Bu
And - to add to this - I still can freeze up my pentium
laptop rather quickly (3.2-RELEASE, 40meg memory, P90) running
setiathome.
And - I've got DDB in the kernel, and ensured it's not overheating
(it will freeze up in less than a minute from a _very_ cold start.)
I don't get a panic, ddb promp
>
> On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> :Will you be assigning the copyright to the FSF? (ie: you'll never be able
> :to change your mind? 50 years is a long time...)
>
> 70 now I believe. Changed to be compatible with the euros, who are all 70
> years apparently.
If I understand th
>
> In a discussion with Nate Williams, I have learned that the reason FreeBSD
> doesn't use minor numbers with shared libraries because standard ELF doesn't
> support it. Is this a hard-and-fast unbreakable rule, or is this something
> that could be implemented if it can be done in a way that's c
>
> In a discussion with Nate Williams, I have learned that the reason FreeBSD
> doesn't use minor numbers with shared libraries because standard ELF doesn't
> support it. Is this a hard-and-fast unbreakable rule, or is this something
> that could be implemented if it can be done in a way that's
> On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Jay West wrote:
>
> > Keep in mind that the merced chip was not really designed or created by
> > Intel at all.
> >=20
> > It was created almost completely by HP (by the same group responsible for
> > PA-RISC), with Intel as merely the production facilities. For obvious
> >
> On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Jay West wrote:
>
> > Keep in mind that the merced chip was not really designed or created by
> > Intel at all.
> >=20
> > It was created almost completely by HP (by the same group responsible for
> > PA-RISC), with Intel as merely the production facilities. For obvious
> >
Kenny Drobnack
> Lately i have seen a lot of speculation as to what will happen when the
> Intel Merced comes out. Will people wait 12-18 months for a 64 bit
> Windows (that's the amount of time I keep hearing it will take them to get
> Win2000 running on it) or will they just buy it and pop Lin
Kenny Drobnack <[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Lately i have seen a lot of speculation as to what will happen when the
> Intel Merced comes out. Will people wait 12-18 months for a 64 bit
> Windows (that's the amount of time I keep hearing it will take them to get
> Win2000 running on it) or will
> All the files under Tandem's NSK has mandatory locking. The file cannot be
> opened if another process has it opened. some thing like
>
> * if the file is opened for reading, any one can open it for
> reading but opening for writing gives error
> * if the file is open for writing, it can
> All the files under Tandem's NSK has mandatory locking. The file cannot be
> opened if another process has it opened. some thing like
>
> * if the file is opened for reading, any one can open it for
> reading but opening for writing gives error
> * if the file is open for writing, it ca
I had a thought on this
It seems you are trying to provide the "floppy model" that users
currently have with their PCs.
User A writes the floppy, User B can read it and do whatever he
wants...
(I know this is Apple - but I'll stick to MSDOS for the discussion,
and "floppy" indicates any re
I had a thought on this
It seems you are trying to provide the "floppy model" that users
currently have with their PCs.
User A writes the floppy, User B can read it and do whatever he
wants...
(I know this is Apple - but I'll stick to MSDOS for the discussion,
and "floppy" indicates any r
>
>
> Bill Fumerola writes:
> > On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
> >
> > The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
> >
> > Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own committers. Coo
>
>
> Bill Fumerola writes:
> > On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
> >
> > The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
> >
> > Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own committers. Co
>
> > >
> > > If someone is interested to solve a problem:
> > >
> > > $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=8848 count=1 of=a 2>/dev/null
> > > $ cp a b
> > > $ cmp a b 0 0x300
> > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > > $ cmp a b 0 0x200
> > > cmp: EOF on b
> > > $ cmp a b 0x300 0
> > > cmp: EOF on a
> > >
>
>
> > >
> > > If someone is interested to solve a problem:
> > >
> > > $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=8848 count=1 of=a 2>/dev/null
> > > $ cp a b
> > > $ cmp a b 0 0x300
> > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > > $ cmp a b 0 0x200
> > > cmp: EOF on b
> > > $ cmp a b 0x300 0
> > > cmp: EOF on a
> > >
>
> If someone is interested to solve a problem:
>
> $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=8848 count=1 of=a 2>/dev/null
> $ cp a b
> $ cmp a b 0 0x300
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> $ cmp a b 0 0x200
> cmp: EOF on b
> $ cmp a b 0x300 0
> cmp: EOF on a
>
> Jean-Marc
>
I've seen a similar problem when do
>
> If someone is interested to solve a problem:
>
> $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=8848 count=1 of=a 2>/dev/null
> $ cp a b
> $ cmp a b 0 0x300
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> $ cmp a b 0 0x200
> cmp: EOF on b
> $ cmp a b 0x300 0
> cmp: EOF on a
>
> Jean-Marc
>
I've seen a similar problem when d
>
>Also, I haven't gone into the code yet, but the floating point
> registers are not saved into the sigcontext so that they can be
> inspected and modified as appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
> John
If I recall correctly - I think there's a discussion of why this
is the case in the -hackers ma
>
>Also, I haven't gone into the code yet, but the floating point
> registers are not saved into the sigcontext so that they can be
> inspected and modified as appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
> John
If I recall correctly - I think there's a discussion of why this
is the case in the -hackers m
I just wondered if this should be integrated into ptrace(), so
the various debuggers wouldn't have to know about it.
It seems that would be the proper abstraction - hardware that supports
it would "have it" - and the programs that "used it" wouldn't have to
know anything special.
I only have a
I just wondered if this should be integrated into ptrace(), so
the various debuggers wouldn't have to know about it.
It seems that would be the proper abstraction - hardware that supports
it would "have it" - and the programs that "used it" wouldn't have to
know anything special.
I only have
>
> Hi,
>
> After recently debugging a very elusive memory overwrite problem that
> I was only able to find by setting up a debugger watch point, and
> suffering through the slowness that this introduced, I began reading
> up on the ix86 support for hardware watch points. Using this facility
>
>
> Hi,
>
> After recently debugging a very elusive memory overwrite problem that
> I was only able to find by setting up a debugger watch point, and
> suffering through the slowness that this introduced, I began reading
> up on the ix86 support for hardware watch points. Using this facility
> o
>
> > That being said... I've heard some of my ex-coworkers (who were all
> > FreeBSD people when they worked here) come up to me in this impressed
> > tone: "You wouldn't believe how much easier it is to install RedHat!'.
> > *sigh* I'm not bitching... just being loyal :)
>
> That's ridiculous.
>
> > That being said... I've heard some of my ex-coworkers (who were all
> > FreeBSD people when they worked here) come up to me in this impressed
> > tone: "You wouldn't believe how much easier it is to install RedHat!'.
> > *sigh* I'm not bitching... just being loyal :)
>
> That's ridiculous.
> > Would everyone agree that it's not a "good thing" for a user-mode
> > program to be able to lock up the OS?
> >
> There are severall resons.
> One of them is that I got panics with a to high set MAXUSER in kernel options.
> I don't know if it's a problem with 3.2.
> The other possible reason
> > Would everyone agree that it's not a "good thing" for a user-mode
> > program to be able to lock up the OS?
> >
> There are severall resons.
> One of them is that I got panics with a to high set MAXUSER in kernel options.
> I don't know if it's a problem with 3.2.
> The other possible reason m
I seem to recall seeing this someone (this may not be the
right list.)
But - I downloaded the 3.2 s...@home and starting running it
on a left-over 75mhz laptop I have.
It seems to crash the laptop (silently lock it up, actually)
fairly quickly.
Did I recall someone else mentioning that?
Would
>
> Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> >
> > To add more to this - tracing through in.c in the kernel,
> > I see that when you configure an interface it eventually
> > works its way down to rtrequest - to add a route for
> > the new interface.
> >
> > I
Well -
I've added some printf()s to determine that what I suspected
was correct. The route is being entered into the table
twice.
If looks like in_ifinit() is calling the sioctl() routine,
which calls if_up(), which then adds the route.
Then, in_ifinit() goes on to add another route and *p
To add more to this - tracing through in.c in the kernel,
I see that when you configure an interface it eventually
works its way down to rtrequest - to add a route for
the new interface.
I believe rtrequest() is the one returning EEXIST which is
what causes ifconfig on sl0 to always complain "Fil
>
>
> I don't seem to be able to get 3.2 to do a SL/IP
> install (this is for a laptop which seems to be
> having PAO problems...)
>
> Turning on DEBUG in the install options, I can watch
> it nicely execute:
>
> ifconfig sl0 inet 10.0.0.98 10.0.0.99 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> but - not matter
I don't seem to be able to get 3.2 to do a SL/IP
install (this is for a laptop which seems to be
having PAO problems...)
Turning on DEBUG in the install options, I can watch
it nicely execute:
ifconfig sl0 inet 10.0.0.98 10.0.0.99 netmask 255.255.255.0
but - not matter what - that always seems
>
> There is a story behind it: our product was shipping for hpux
> and was later ported to sinix. It had some instabilities during
> development (it was first developed for hpux, then the enhancements were
> ported to sinix, almost in parallel).
>
> A colleague wrote (paraphrased)
> > symlinks have caused me grief (Pyramid OSx) and never joy. I hope it fails
> > yet again to appear in FreeBSD. Just think of the new security holes for a
> > start.
>
> Name one, please. You can currently point a symlink anyplace you
> like; whether the user has permission to *read* or exec
>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 12:40:46AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> > >
> > > Can someone comment please? Is this a bug in the way the gcc2.8 is
> > > installed, or is it a bug in my understanding? (probably the latter).
> >
> > Perhaps you need a gcc-compiled version of libstdc++. It's just
>
> The machine is a SMP 3.0-RELEASE box.
>
> A heavily threaded program is segfaulting in the longjmp() function.
> Any ideas what would cause this?
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
You could have trashed your jmp_buf... (i.e. you're passing bad data
to longjmp().)
Just a thought...
-
> On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 10:45:39AM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> > > (gdb) bt
> > > #0 0x8052c0f in ostream::flush () at /usr/include/ctype.h:149
> > > #1 0x8052912 in ostream::operator<< () at /usr/include/ctype.h:149
> > > #2 0x804995f in m
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
